2016
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education

Abstract: This report highlights the discussions and recommendations featured at the first summit meeting of projects funded by the National Science Foundation’s Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education program, held January 14–16, 2016, in Washington, DC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are in line with the opinion of [6], about the problem of the preparation of tests that often occur in teachers at junior high school (SMP) generally made by teachers less attention to the level of validity and reliability. This is because teacher-made tests cover only limited material.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The results are in line with the opinion of [6], about the problem of the preparation of tests that often occur in teachers at junior high school (SMP) generally made by teachers less attention to the level of validity and reliability. This is because teacher-made tests cover only limited material.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Multifactor interventions can be relatively short and intense in a field or professional setting and result in high URM recruitment that often is not the case for longer interventions and research experiences (Diaz Eaton et al 2016). An example of a multifactor intervention is the Rocky Mountain Science and Sustainability Network's (RMSSN) academy, started with a five-year grant from the National Science Foundation to G. Bowser and M. A.…”
Section: Part 2 Brief Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling takes on many forms, including experiential (physical manipulatives), visual, verbal (qualitative discourse), numerical (quantitative data), or symbolic quantitative models [44]. Multiple model representations can provide different perspective of a problem and thus, have the potential to improve students' comprehensive understanding [45][46] as they encode and retrieve knowledge in different modalities [47].…”
Section: Quantitative Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%