1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02766294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summing up approaches to the study of science and technology indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• the number of employees, which is considered in the literature to be the most valid indicator of the size of an enterprise (SCHERER, 1992); • expenditure for in-house research and development, the primary index of investment in scientific and technological advance (DE MARCHI & ROCCHI, 1999), (SCHERER, 1992); • expenditure for basic research, which, according to the development of the absorption approach (COHEN & LEVINTHAL, 1989) proposed by ROSENBERG (1990) is a particularly significant indicator of the effort sustained by enterprises to monitor external scientific and technological knowledge;…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• the number of employees, which is considered in the literature to be the most valid indicator of the size of an enterprise (SCHERER, 1992); • expenditure for in-house research and development, the primary index of investment in scientific and technological advance (DE MARCHI & ROCCHI, 1999), (SCHERER, 1992); • expenditure for basic research, which, according to the development of the absorption approach (COHEN & LEVINTHAL, 1989) proposed by ROSENBERG (1990) is a particularly significant indicator of the effort sustained by enterprises to monitor external scientific and technological knowledge;…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%