“…The occurrence of MPs in snow ranged from 0 to 1.5 × 10 5 MPs L −1 of melted snow (Bergmann et al, 2019), although it should be noted that a part of this study was conducted near urban areas. Regarding sea ice, concentrations of up to 1.2 × 10 4 MPs L −1 have been reported, although there are large differences between studies even from the same region (Peeken et al, 2018;von Friesen et al, 2020). The use of different units in reporting MP concentrations in mountain glaciers such as the number of items per mass of ice weight (78.3 ± 30.2 MPs kg −1 of sparse and fine supraglacial debris; Ambrosini et al, 2019) and mass of MPs per volume (0 to 23.6 ± 3.0 ng of MPs mL −1 ; Matericì et al, 2020) makes comparisons between studies difficult (e.g., 101.2 items L −1 ; Cabrera et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plastics, especially microplastics (plastic items <5 mm long; MPs), have been detected in several specific locations of the cryosphere, including mountain glaciers (Ambrosini et al, 2019;Cabrera et al, 2020;Matericì et al, 2020), polar and urban snow (Bergmann et al, 2019;Österlund et al, 2019), and sea ice (Geilfus et al, 2019;Kelly et al, 2020;La Daana et al, 2020;Obbard et al, 2014;Peeken et al, 2018;von Friesen et al, 2020). The occurrence of MPs in snow ranged from 0 to 1.5 × 10 5 MPs L −1 of melted snow (Bergmann et al, 2019), although it should be noted that a part of this study was conducted near urban areas.…”
Abstract. Plastics have been found in several compartments in Antarctica. However,
there is currently no evidence of their presence on Antarctic glaciers. Our
pilot study investigated plastic occurrence on two ice surfaces (one area
around Uruguay Lake and another one around Ionosferico Lake) that
constitute part of the ablation zone of Collins Glacier (King George Island,
Antarctica). Our results showed that expanded polystyrene (EPS) was
ubiquitous, ranging from 0.17 to 0.33 items m−2, whereas polyester was
found only on the ice surface around Uruguay Lake (0.25 items m−2).
Furthermore, we evaluated the daily changes in the presence of plastics in
these areas in the absence of rainfall to clarify the role of the wind in
their transport. We registered an atmospheric dry deposition rate between
0.08 items m−2 d−1 on the ice surface around Uruguay Lake and
0.17 items m−2 d−1 on the ice surface around Ionosferico Lake.
Our pilot study is the first report of plastic pollution presence on an
Antarctic glacier, possibly originated from local current and past
activities and likely deposited by wind transport.
“…The occurrence of MPs in snow ranged from 0 to 1.5 × 10 5 MPs L −1 of melted snow (Bergmann et al, 2019), although it should be noted that a part of this study was conducted near urban areas. Regarding sea ice, concentrations of up to 1.2 × 10 4 MPs L −1 have been reported, although there are large differences between studies even from the same region (Peeken et al, 2018;von Friesen et al, 2020). The use of different units in reporting MP concentrations in mountain glaciers such as the number of items per mass of ice weight (78.3 ± 30.2 MPs kg −1 of sparse and fine supraglacial debris; Ambrosini et al, 2019) and mass of MPs per volume (0 to 23.6 ± 3.0 ng of MPs mL −1 ; Matericì et al, 2020) makes comparisons between studies difficult (e.g., 101.2 items L −1 ; Cabrera et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plastics, especially microplastics (plastic items <5 mm long; MPs), have been detected in several specific locations of the cryosphere, including mountain glaciers (Ambrosini et al, 2019;Cabrera et al, 2020;Matericì et al, 2020), polar and urban snow (Bergmann et al, 2019;Österlund et al, 2019), and sea ice (Geilfus et al, 2019;Kelly et al, 2020;La Daana et al, 2020;Obbard et al, 2014;Peeken et al, 2018;von Friesen et al, 2020). The occurrence of MPs in snow ranged from 0 to 1.5 × 10 5 MPs L −1 of melted snow (Bergmann et al, 2019), although it should be noted that a part of this study was conducted near urban areas.…”
Abstract. Plastics have been found in several compartments in Antarctica. However,
there is currently no evidence of their presence on Antarctic glaciers. Our
pilot study investigated plastic occurrence on two ice surfaces (one area
around Uruguay Lake and another one around Ionosferico Lake) that
constitute part of the ablation zone of Collins Glacier (King George Island,
Antarctica). Our results showed that expanded polystyrene (EPS) was
ubiquitous, ranging from 0.17 to 0.33 items m−2, whereas polyester was
found only on the ice surface around Uruguay Lake (0.25 items m−2).
Furthermore, we evaluated the daily changes in the presence of plastics in
these areas in the absence of rainfall to clarify the role of the wind in
their transport. We registered an atmospheric dry deposition rate between
0.08 items m−2 d−1 on the ice surface around Uruguay Lake and
0.17 items m−2 d−1 on the ice surface around Ionosferico Lake.
Our pilot study is the first report of plastic pollution presence on an
Antarctic glacier, possibly originated from local current and past
activities and likely deposited by wind transport.
“…MPs may also become temporarily or permanently trapped within algal mats (Feng et al, 2020) or by physical barriers such as dams (Watkins et al, 2019). Environmental perturbations, such as flooding, weather events and habitat alterations, can then free previously trapped or sunk MPs into the environment, which then gradually pass through aquatic systems and biota (von Friesen et al, 2020; O’Connor et al, 2019; Ockelford et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental perturbations, such as flooding, weather events and habitat alterations, can then free previously trapped or sunk MPs into the environment, which then gradually pass through aquatic systems and biota (von Friesen et al, 2020;O'Connor et al, 2019;Ockelford et al, 2020).…”
Microplastics (MPs) are small, plastic particles of various shapes, sizes and polymers.Although well studied in marine systems, their roles and importance in freshwater environments remain uncertain. Nevertheless, the restricted ranges and variable traits of freshwater fishes result in their communities being important receptors and strong bioindicators of MP pollution. Here, the current knowledge on MPs in freshwater fishes is synthesized, along with the development of recommendations for future research and sample processing. MPs are commonly ingested and passively taken up by numerous freshwater fishes, with ingestion patterns often related to individual traits (e.g. body size, trophic level) and environmental factors (e.g. local urbanization, habitat features). Controlled MP exposure studies highlight various effects on fish physiology, biochemistry and behaviour that are often complex, unpredictable, species-specific and nonlinear in respect of dose-response relationships.Egestion is typically rapid and effective, although particles of a particular shape and/ or size may remain, or translocate across the intestinal wall to other organs via the blood. Regarding future studies, there is a need to understand the interactions of MP pollution with other anthropogenic stressors (e.g. warming, eutrophication), with a concomitant requirement to increase the complexity of studies to enable impact assessment at population, community and ecosystem levels, and to determine whether there are consequences for processes, such as parasite transmission, where MPs could vector parasites or increase infection susceptibility. This knowledge will determine the extent to which MP pollution can be considered a major anthropogenic stressor of freshwaters in this era of global environmental change.
“…While the impact of snow and ice on shoreline plastic accumulation has not yet been fully investigated, both snow and sea ice have been identified as important sinks for microplastics in other contexts (Obbard et al, 2014;Peeken et al, 2018;Bergmann et al, 2019;Kelly et al, 2020). High concentrations of microplastics found in snow and ice are released seasonally following snow and ice melt, a process that has been observed in surface waters (Ory et al, 2020;Uurasjärvi et al, 2020;Von Friesen et al, 2020). There is a significant body of emerging research confirming the importance of landscape features in shaping shoreline plastic deposition.…”
Shoreline surveys are an accessible and common method for monitoring plastic pollution in aquatic environments. Their results are critical to well-informed pollution mitigation efforts. Here, we show that three environmental variables: (1) coarse sediment, (2) accumulations of organic material, and (3) snow and ice are dramatically underrepresented by existing shoreline plastic pollution research efforts. We reviewed 361 published shoreline surveys, encompassing 3,284 sample sites, and found that only 4% of sites included coarse sediment, only one study described sampling organic material for plastic, and only 2.5% of sites are sampled in the presence of ice or snow. The relative absence of these environmental variables may stem from the tailoring of shoreline survey guidelines to a narrow range of shoreline environments. These three features influence plastic deposition and retention on shorelines, and their underrepresentation signals a need to recalibrate research efforts towards better methodological reporting, and regional representation and relevance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.