2011
DOI: 10.1080/10409289.2010.489891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summer School and Summer Learning: An Examination of the Short- and Longer Term Changes in Student Literacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The intervention group maintained their reading ability across the summer on nearly all measures, and significantly improved their scores on a few measures. The present findings align with prior studies reporting that summer programs can reduce or prevent summer slump in students characterized as having learning disabilities (Cornelius & Semmel, 1982), falling short of literacy benchmarks (Zvoch & Stevens, 2011, 2013, coming from low SES homes (Johnston, Riley, Ryan, & Kelly-Vance, 2015;Kim & Quinn, 2013), or enrolled in schools with programs to foster summer reading in minority children (Kim & White, 2008). Thus, the summer may offer a significant opportunity to support students with reading difficulty in maintaining or improving their reading skills rather than falling even farther behind, especially students from low SES environments (Allington & McGill-Franzen, 2013), and to place those students on a better trajectory for learning to read and for all the other educational benefits and opportunities associated with effective reading.…”
Section: Implications For Research and Policysupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The intervention group maintained their reading ability across the summer on nearly all measures, and significantly improved their scores on a few measures. The present findings align with prior studies reporting that summer programs can reduce or prevent summer slump in students characterized as having learning disabilities (Cornelius & Semmel, 1982), falling short of literacy benchmarks (Zvoch & Stevens, 2011, 2013, coming from low SES homes (Johnston, Riley, Ryan, & Kelly-Vance, 2015;Kim & Quinn, 2013), or enrolled in schools with programs to foster summer reading in minority children (Kim & White, 2008). Thus, the summer may offer a significant opportunity to support students with reading difficulty in maintaining or improving their reading skills rather than falling even farther behind, especially students from low SES environments (Allington & McGill-Franzen, 2013), and to place those students on a better trajectory for learning to read and for all the other educational benefits and opportunities associated with effective reading.…”
Section: Implications For Research and Policysupporting
confidence: 94%
“…As a means to support struggling readers over the summer vacation period, the district established an academically intensive summer literacy program. Summer instructional programs are considered a targeted and cost-effective approach to offset the ''summer slide'' in achievement that is commonly observed among youth from disadvantaged backgrounds (Borman & Dowling, 2006;Cooper, Charlton, Valentine, & Muhlenbruck, 2000;Zvoch & Stevens, 2011). The theory of change underlying the district's summer school initiative follows the ''faucet theory'' of learning, which suggests that distinct seasonal learning patterns stem from educational resources available at different points in the calendar year (Alexander, Entwisle, & Olson, 2001;Entwisle, Alexander, & Olson, 1997).…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jacob and Lefgren (2004) examine the introduction of a compulsory summer school for low achievers in examinations, and using a regression discontinuity design find significant positive effects for third graders, but no significant effects for sixth graders. Similar, small results of extra tuition over the summer produce positive, small effects (Zvoch and Stevens (2011), Matsudaira (2008)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%