2007
DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(2007)157[11:sglban]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summer Ground Layer Biomass and Nutrient Contribution to Above-ground Litter in an Indiana Temperate Deciduous Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our review of the literature, the contribution of the understorey to the yearly carbon flux to the soil ranges between 1% and 42% ( Figure 1a). This estimated range slightly exceeds the one reported by Welch et al (2007) (0.4%-28.8%). The high variability of values found in the literature can be partially attributed to differences in understorey definitions.…”
Section: Overview Of Values Published In the Literaturecontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on our review of the literature, the contribution of the understorey to the yearly carbon flux to the soil ranges between 1% and 42% ( Figure 1a). This estimated range slightly exceeds the one reported by Welch et al (2007) (0.4%-28.8%). The high variability of values found in the literature can be partially attributed to differences in understorey definitions.…”
Section: Overview Of Values Published In the Literaturecontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The concentrations of all nutrients in all four studies were higher in herbaceous vegetation compared to tree leaves (except for Ca concentration in one study performed by Gosz et al, ). After omitting one outlier (around 30 times higher concentration of K in understorey leaves compared to overstorey leaves; Welch et al, ), nutrient concentrations in the understorey were on average between 1.5 and 5 times higher than those found in overstorey leaves, depending on the nutrient considered. Average nutrient specific understorey:overstorey concentration ratios were 103% for Ca, 236% for N, 289% for P, 308% for Mg and 210% for K. The overall mean ratio was 231% across all nutrients (Figure b; Table S3).…”
Section: Quantification Of the Functional Importance Of The Understoreymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the herbaceous plants account for a small fraction (often <1%) of stand biomass, they represent a considerably higher fraction of forest net primary productivity and litter production (Gilliam, 2007). Herbaceous plants in forests thus are important regulators of nutrient cycling and overall ecosystem functioning (Welch, Belmont, & Randolph, 2007). Moreover, the concept that herbaceous communities in the understory of temperate forests are only influenced by the woody plants but do not influence them in turn has been challenged in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van der Heijden et al 1998), biogeochemical and nutrient cycles (e.g. Zak et al 1990;Tessier and Raynal 2003;Mueller et al 2012;Neufeld and Young 2014;Welch et al 2007; van der Heijden and Horton 2009; but see Rothstein 2000), and ecosystem services (reviewed in Gilliam 2007). Understory herbaceous species also provide critical food resources, physical structure, and habitat heterogeneity (Roberts and Gilliam 2003;Roberts 2004) that support biodiversity of other ecologically important plant groups and in other trophic levels including insects, birds and mammals (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%