2021
DOI: 10.1177/25152459211035109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summary Plots With Adjusted Error Bars: The superb Framework With an Implementation in R

Abstract: Plotting the data of an experiment allows researchers to illustrate the main results of a study, show effect sizes, compare conditions, and guide interpretations. To achieve all this, it is necessary to show point estimates of the results and their precision using error bars. Often, and potentially unbeknownst to them, researchers use a type of error bars—the confidence intervals—that convey limited information. For instance, confidence intervals do not allow comparing results (a) between groups, (b) between r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) Presence of the color singleton distractor speeded responses and improved accuracy, indicating suppression. Error bars in all figures represent within-subject standard errors (Cousineau et al, 2021). See the online article for the color version of this figure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) Presence of the color singleton distractor speeded responses and improved accuracy, indicating suppression. Error bars in all figures represent within-subject standard errors (Cousineau et al, 2021). See the online article for the color version of this figure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When visually inspecting the outputs generated with the syntax collection, it needs to be kept in mind that the CIs plotted around arithmetic means are unadjusted stand-alone CIs ( Cousineau et al, 2021 ). These intervals are of limited use for the comparison between groups and particularly problematic with regard to comparing between factor levels in within-subject designs ( Loftus and Masson, 1994 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These intervals are of limited use for the comparison between groups and particularly problematic with regard to comparing between factor levels in within-subject designs ( Loftus and Masson, 1994 ). Users interested in visualizing adjusted CIs are recommended to consider the R -based library superb ( Cousineau et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scores of the D2-R and psychological variables are reported as means with within-subject correlation-adjusted error bars ( M ± CI), with CI representing the 95% CI normalized to account for the within-subjects design ( Cousineau, 2005 ; Cousineau et al, 2021 ). We computed pre-post intervention change scores for all cognitive and psychological measures which are reported as means with SD ( M ± SD ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%