1994
DOI: 10.1016/0969-806x(94)90228-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summary of the fifth international workshop on slow positron beam techniques for solids and surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guessoum, Ramaty and Lingenfelter (1991) added spectral considerations to the positron-dust process but kept a simplified picture of the dust and showed that unless the abundance of dust in the annihilation regions is increased many times compared to "normal" quantities, grains change the spectrum of the line mostly in the hot phase. Astrophysical knowledge of grains has since increased considerably (see the reviews by Draine 2003, Li 2004, and Krugel 2003 and although a huge body of work exists on positron interactions with solids and solid surfaces (Nieminen & Oliva 1980;Huttunen et al 1990;Dannefaer et al 1996;Dupasquier & Mills 1995;Puska & Nieminen 1994;Weiss et al 1994;Suzuki et al 2003;Mills et al 1989;Mokrushin et al 2003;Pi et al 2003;Weber & Lynn 2000), experiments dealing with positrons and dust like materials remain scarce. We here summarize our best understanding of the relevant information we have collected on dust grains in our context.…”
Section: Grains and Positron Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guessoum, Ramaty and Lingenfelter (1991) added spectral considerations to the positron-dust process but kept a simplified picture of the dust and showed that unless the abundance of dust in the annihilation regions is increased many times compared to "normal" quantities, grains change the spectrum of the line mostly in the hot phase. Astrophysical knowledge of grains has since increased considerably (see the reviews by Draine 2003, Li 2004, and Krugel 2003 and although a huge body of work exists on positron interactions with solids and solid surfaces (Nieminen & Oliva 1980;Huttunen et al 1990;Dannefaer et al 1996;Dupasquier & Mills 1995;Puska & Nieminen 1994;Weiss et al 1994;Suzuki et al 2003;Mills et al 1989;Mokrushin et al 2003;Pi et al 2003;Weber & Lynn 2000), experiments dealing with positrons and dust like materials remain scarce. We here summarize our best understanding of the relevant information we have collected on dust grains in our context.…”
Section: Grains and Positron Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsytovich and Wharton [7] suggested trapping positrons in an MM from a LINAC source. Later on, Boehmer [8] employed cyclotron heating to trap moderated positrons from a radioactive source and to heat the trapped positrons to relativistic energies. The most successful experimental approach, to obtaining positron plasmas, however, has turned out to be the scattering from a buffer gas into a Penning trap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%