2017
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.mr000044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summary of findings tables for communicating key findings of systematic reviews

Abstract: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Methodology). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of 'Summary of findings' tables on communicating key findings of systematic reviews of the effects of healthcare interventions. This will be achieved by: • assessing the effects of 'Summary of findings' tables versus full versions of systematic reviews on communicating key findings of systematic reviews of the effects of healthcare interventions; Summary of findings tables for communicating key findings… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have followed the Cochrane Collaboration reviewed methods for collection and analysis of summary data (16). When there was any data missing in included studies, we tried to contact the authors to get relevant missing data.…”
Section: Collection and Review Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have followed the Cochrane Collaboration reviewed methods for collection and analysis of summary data (16). When there was any data missing in included studies, we tried to contact the authors to get relevant missing data.…”
Section: Collection and Review Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the Cochrane Collaboration reviewed methods for collection and analysis of summary data (14,15).…”
Section: Collection and Review Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment for statistical heterogeneity of the selected studies was done with chi-square and Isquare tests for all the meta-analyses (56,57). The cut-offs of the I-square test for heterogeneity and for the p value of chi-square test were considered as 50% and 0.1 respectively (56,58). Following the heterogeneity assessments, Review Manager (version 5.3) application was used for the metaanalysis(59) with pooling done by Mantel-Haenszel method.…”
Section: Meta-analysis and Narrative Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%