2010 IEEE 26th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icdew.2010.5452706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summarizing ontology-based schemas in PDMS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metrics like precision, recall and F-measure, used by the previous works [8,[13][14][15], are limited in exhibiting the added value of a summarization system because of the "disagreement due to synonymy" [16] meaning that they fail to identify closeness with the ideal result when the results are not exactly the same with the reference ones. On the other hand, content based metrics compute the similarity between two summaries in a more reliable way [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Metrics like precision, recall and F-measure, used by the previous works [8,[13][14][15], are limited in exhibiting the added value of a summarization system because of the "disagreement due to synonymy" [16] meaning that they fail to identify closeness with the ideal result when the results are not exactly the same with the reference ones. On the other hand, content based metrics compute the similarity between two summaries in a more reliable way [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some of these works (e.g. [8,13]) provide a list of the more important nodes, whereas others [7,8,14] and our approach, create a valid summary schema. Finally, other approaches try to navigate on the Linked Data Cloud using summaries of interlinked datasets [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides that, only few efforts have been reported in the literature addressing the quality of the schema summarization methods in general [30,25,10], i.e. the quality of the RDF schema that can be obtained through RDF summarization.…”
Section: Structural Extraction Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar methods have been used in [20,8]. Pirez et al [13] and Queiroz-Sousa et al [16] divide edges by their types into standard (e.g., is-a, part-of, same-as) and user-defined, which are weighted separately.…”
Section: Centrality-based Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%