2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2936137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sum-Throughput Maximization With QoS Constraints for Cooperative WPCNs

Abstract: A wireless powered communication network (WPCN) is considered, which has a hybrid access point (H-AP) and two users with energy harvesting capabilities. The H-AP transfers energy to the users during downlink (DL) transmission, and the users transmit information to the H-AP during uplink (UL) transmission by utilizing the harvested energy. To enhance user fairness, a user cooperation protocol is employed in which a user close to the H-AP relays the message of the other user by partially using its allocated time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [4]- [9], the user cooperation is considered for a three-node WPCN in which all nodes are equipped with single-antenna. In the model proposed in [4] and [5], the user nearer to the HAP transmits the signal of the distant user along with its own signal to the HAP. The sum throughput of the network is maximized by optimal design of time and power allocations.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [4]- [9], the user cooperation is considered for a three-node WPCN in which all nodes are equipped with single-antenna. In the model proposed in [4] and [5], the user nearer to the HAP transmits the signal of the distant user along with its own signal to the HAP. The sum throughput of the network is maximized by optimal design of time and power allocations.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, C det 3 and C det 4 represent non-convex sets. To deal with the aforementioned non-convexity, first we define the sufficiently large parameter 5 ξ k,n such that ∇ 2…”
Section: B Case Study: Deterministic Energy Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the latter is to maximize the minimum achieveable rate of nodes to improve the fairness among the nodes [2]. It is worth noting that the GNs in IoRT are in general deployed with different tasks, which leads to different rate requirements for each GN [23]. With such a motivation, we aim to maximize the system sum rate, subject to the different rate requirements by taking account into the proportional rate constrains (PRC) among the GNs, where PRC can be considered as a fairness-level configuration to guarantee that each GN gets a predetermined proportion of system sum rate [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%