2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2005.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sum rules for four-spinon dynamic structure factor in XXX model

Abstract: In the context of the antiferromagnetic spin 1/2 Heisenberg quantum spin chain (XXX model), we estimate the contribution of the exact four-spinon dynamic structure factor S 4 by calculating a number of sum rules the total dynamic structure factor S is known to satisfy exactly. These sum rules are: the static susceptibility, the integrated intensity, the total integrated intensity, the first frequency moment and the nearest-neighbor correlation function. We find that the contribution of S 4 is between 1% and 2.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have corrected two inaccuracies in [47]: first, the correct normalization is presented here (compare (20) with formula (5.10) there), and most importantly, we have explicitly written that the momentum δ function fixes k only modulo 2π. This has the crucial consequence that two sectors must be considered when solving the dynamical constraints of momentum and energy conservation for 4-spinon intermediate states (this was overlooked in [48,49,50], leading in particular to an incorrect description of the four-spinon continuum). Bearing in mind that the spinon momenta p i are by definition constrained to the interval [−π, 0], we define sectors 0 and 1 as 0 : k + p 1 + p 2 + p 3 + p 4 = 0, 1 : k + 2π + p 1 + p 2 + p 3 + p 4 = 0 (21) with in both cases the energy constraint explicitly written as ω + π 2 (sin p 1 + sin p 2 + sin p 3 + sin p 4 ) = 0.…”
Section: -Spinon Contribution To the Structure Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have corrected two inaccuracies in [47]: first, the correct normalization is presented here (compare (20) with formula (5.10) there), and most importantly, we have explicitly written that the momentum δ function fixes k only modulo 2π. This has the crucial consequence that two sectors must be considered when solving the dynamical constraints of momentum and energy conservation for 4-spinon intermediate states (this was overlooked in [48,49,50], leading in particular to an incorrect description of the four-spinon continuum). Bearing in mind that the spinon momenta p i are by definition constrained to the interval [−π, 0], we define sectors 0 and 1 as 0 : k + p 1 + p 2 + p 3 + p 4 = 0, 1 : k + 2π + p 1 + p 2 + p 3 + p 4 = 0 (21) with in both cases the energy constraint explicitly written as ω + π 2 (sin p 1 + sin p 2 + sin p 3 + sin p 4 ) = 0.…”
Section: -Spinon Contribution To the Structure Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further analytical work [48] yielded little progress, and in fact (as we will show below) incorrectly identified the boundaries of the four-spinon continuum. To this day, nobody has been able to extract curves from these expressions, and previous attempts [49,50] have not yielded acceptable results due to the inappropriateness of the chosen method and the incorrect continuum used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,33,91,92 For the present work sum rules can be applied to assess the quality of the analytic continuation. We will focus on the sum rules for the static structure factor S ␣␤ ͑q͒ and the static susceptibility ␣␤ ͑q͒ which are obtained by integral transforming the dynamical structure factor, 93…”
Section: Sum Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, also BA allows to determine dynamical correlation functions, however calculating the corresponding matrix elements is highly non-trivial and progress has been made only recently. By now analytic expressions for dynamical spin correlation functions are available for the two- 27,28,29 and the fourspinon sector 30,31,32,33 at ∆ = 1, h = 0 and T = 0. In addition, determinant approaches 34,35 allow for numerical treatment of two- 36,37,38 and many-spinon 39,40 states of the XXZ chain in finite magnetic fields, at T = 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%