2015
DOI: 10.2969/jmsj/06731069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sum formula for finite multiple zeta values

Abstract: The sum formula is one of the most well-known relations among multiple zeta values. This paper proves a conjecture of Kaneko predicting that an analogous formula holds for finite multiple zeta values.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let k = ({1} i−1 , 2, {1} r−i ) and e = k − r − 1 in (17). Then k ∨ = (i, r − i + 1) and we have (14) and Theorem 2.4. Since k is even, one of B p−k+r+j or B p−j−r−1 is zero.…”
Section: Sum Formulas Formentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let k = ({1} i−1 , 2, {1} r−i ) and e = k − r − 1 in (17). Then k ∨ = (i, r − i + 1) and we have (14) and Theorem 2.4. Since k is even, one of B p−k+r+j or B p−j−r−1 is zero.…”
Section: Sum Formulas Formentioning
confidence: 96%
“…from the identity (6) in the samy way as (18). Let us fix 0 ≤ j < k − r. By (14) and Proposition 4.6, if j + r is odd, then ζ ⋆ A 3 ({1} k−r−j ) is divisible by p and T ⋆ j+r,r is divisible by p 2 and if j + r is even, then ζ ⋆ A 3 ({1} k−r−j ) is divisible by p 2 and T ⋆ j+r,r is divisible by p. Therefore, ζ ⋆ A 3 ({1} k−r−j )T ⋆ j+r,r = 0 and we see that the left hand side of (23) is equal to T ⋆ k,r . On the other hand, by using Proposition 4.1, Proposition 4.2 and (22), we see that the right hand side of (23) is equal to Let us fix 1 ≤ j ≤ r − 1 and j ≤ l ≤ k − r + j.…”
Section: Sum Formulas For a 3 -Finite Multiple Zeta Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, S k,n,i enjoy the recursion relation in the following lemma, which can be proved in the same way as in [11…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…They conjecture that the finite multiple zeta values satisfy the same Qlinear relation as the symmetric multiple zeta values and vice versa (see Conjecture 3.10). A few families of Q-linear relations which are satisfied by the finite and the symmetric multiple zeta values simultaneously are obtained by the works of Murahara, Saito and Wakabayashi in [11,15], where the star versions ζ ⋆ A (k) and ζ ⋆ S (k) are also considered. In the present paper, we examine for n ∈ Z 1 the values z n (k; ζ n ) and z ⋆ n (k; ζ n ) of finite multiple harmonic q-series z n (k; q) and z ⋆ n (k; q) evaluated at a primitive n-th root of unity ζ n (see Definition 2.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%