Ecology of Coastal Vegetation 1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-5524-0_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulphide tolerance in coastal halophytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High mortality to culms and below-ground root and rhizome tissue occurred at a mean interstitial sulphide concentration of 0-63 mM in P. hemitomon, while only minor culm and below-ground mortality was observed in S. alterniflora at 1-13 mm sulphide, indicating a greater sulphide tolerance in the latter species. Havill, Ingold & Pearson (1985) also showed that 86Rb radioisotope uptake was inhibited in F. rubra, A. patula, and P. maritima when suphide was added, suggesting that it may adversely affect transport processes in roots. Hence, the differential growth response of the two species was not due to a greater precipitation of soluble sulphide, as FeS, in the more mineral, higher Fe salt marsh soil compared to the less mineral, lower Fe fresh marsh soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High mortality to culms and below-ground root and rhizome tissue occurred at a mean interstitial sulphide concentration of 0-63 mM in P. hemitomon, while only minor culm and below-ground mortality was observed in S. alterniflora at 1-13 mm sulphide, indicating a greater sulphide tolerance in the latter species. Havill, Ingold & Pearson (1985) also showed that 86Rb radioisotope uptake was inhibited in F. rubra, A. patula, and P. maritima when suphide was added, suggesting that it may adversely affect transport processes in roots. Hence, the differential growth response of the two species was not due to a greater precipitation of soluble sulphide, as FeS, in the more mineral, higher Fe salt marsh soil compared to the less mineral, lower Fe fresh marsh soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These biochemical reductions proceed in a thermodynamic sequence following critical redox potentials (Patrick 1964: Connell & Patrick 1968Turner & Patrick 1968) producing N2, NH4+, Mn2+, Fe2+, H2S and CH4 (Ponnamperuma 1972), many of which may be toxic to wetland flora if they accumulate. Sulphide significantly reduced polyphenol oxidase and external phosphatase activity in two European high marsh species, Atriplex patula L. and Festuca rubra L. (Havill, Ingold & Pearson 1985). Goodman & Williams (1961) measured 02, C02, and alcohol content in Spartina townsendii roots from 'healthy', channel 'die back', and pan 'die back' sites, as an indicator of anaerobic root metabolism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the biological roles of DMSP and its cleavage products are not completely understood, some of their proposed functions in algae have included osmoregulation (Dickson et al 1980, Reed 1983a,b, Edwards et al. 1987, 1988), sulfur detoxification (Havill et al 1985), and cryoprotection (Kirst et al 1991, Karsten et al 1992, 1996). The DMSP cleavage reaction may also be involved in an antiherbivore activated defense in U. lactuca (= U. fenestrata ; Hayden and Waaland 2004) from the northeastern Pacific (Van Alstyne et al 2001, Van Alstyne and Houser 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ingold & Havill (1984) found that the addition of 100 µ m sulphide to a sealed water‐culture system did not have an adverse effect on the growth and root development of S. europaea , unlike three other salt marsh species examined; S. europaea was also the only vascular plant rooted in sulphide‐containing sediments on a lower marsh. Havill et al . (1985) similarly did not detect any adverse effects of this concentration of sulphide on its growth and metabolism.…”
Section: Structure and Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%