1976
DOI: 10.1136/gut.17.11.861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulphated and unsulphated bile acids in serum, bile, and urine of patients with cholestasis.

Abstract: SUMMARY Samples of serum, bile, and urine were collected simultaneously from patients with cholestasis of varying aetiology and from patients with cirrhosis; their bile acid composition was determined by gas/liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry In cholestasis, the patterns in all three body fluids differed consistently and strikingly. In serum, cholic acid was the major bile acid and most bile acids (> 93 %) were unsulphated, whereas, in urine, chenodeoxycholic was the major bile acid, and the majority … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
57
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(21 reference statements)
4
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,23,34 However, in contrast to mice, sulfation of bile acids is a relevant metabolic pathway in humans reflected by increased amounts in serum and urine of patients with cholestasis. 5,6 Thus, a picture is emerging in which coordinated induction of hepatic bile acid hydroxylation (i.e., Cyp2b10 and Cyp3a11; phase I) and potentially sulfation (i.e., Sult2a1; phase II) together with overexpression of adaptive bile acid export systems (i.e., Mrp3 and Mrp4; phase III) may represent therapeutically inducible, alternative pathways. Moreover, additional stimulatory effects of CAR agonists (TCPOBOP) on the expression levels of the bile acid receptor PXR might amplify such alternative pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,23,34 However, in contrast to mice, sulfation of bile acids is a relevant metabolic pathway in humans reflected by increased amounts in serum and urine of patients with cholestasis. 5,6 Thus, a picture is emerging in which coordinated induction of hepatic bile acid hydroxylation (i.e., Cyp2b10 and Cyp3a11; phase I) and potentially sulfation (i.e., Sult2a1; phase II) together with overexpression of adaptive bile acid export systems (i.e., Mrp3 and Mrp4; phase III) may represent therapeutically inducible, alternative pathways. Moreover, additional stimulatory effects of CAR agonists (TCPOBOP) on the expression levels of the bile acid receptor PXR might amplify such alternative pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, detoxification of accumulating biliary compounds via phase I hydroxylation and phase II conjugation may counteract cholestatic liver damage by rendering hydrophobic substrates less toxic and better soluble for biliary and urinary excretion. 5,6 However, intrinsic hepatocellular adaptive induction of transporters and enzymes in cholestasis is too weak to prevent ongoing liver injury. 4,7 In addition to the classical bile acid receptor, farnesoid X receptor (FXR), also the xenobiotic receptors, constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR), critically participate in the regulation of genes involved in the detoxification and transport of bile acids and bilirubin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steady-state serum bile acid levels result from a combination of mechanical regurgitation of conjugated bile acids from the obstructed biliary system, transporter mediated efflux from hepatocytes, and clearance from the circulation by extrahepatic mechanisms, particularly glomerular filtration and renal tubular excretion. 30,34,35 Assuming that CBDL results in equivalent degrees of bile acid regurgitation and renal clearance in both wild-type and Mrp4Ϫ/Ϫ mice, the lower levels of serum bile acids seem most likely to be due to a reduced ability of Mrp4Ϫ/Ϫ mice to export bile acids from hepatocytes back into the systemic circulation. (This assumption discounts any role that renal Mrp4 might play in bile acid excretion, which, in its absence, would tend to minimize the serum differences.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A certain amount of each bile acid is conjugated with amino acid such as glycine and taurine, and/or sulfate. Several studies revealed that the composition of bile acid was altered in human liver disease (van Berge Henegouwen et al, 1976;Shoda et al, 1990). We could not determine the composition of UBA in the present study, because UBA -ly oxidized non-sulfoconjugated bile acids.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%