1988
DOI: 10.1080/00107530.1988.10746264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sullivan's Contribution to Psychoanalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And then set all this in the context of the mainstream psychoanalytic theory of Sullivan's era, according to which, in the eyes of at least some analysts, "Re lationships as such are not real; a psychology can be complete without considering more than the individual apparatus and events within it, plus the general class of external stimuli" (Holt, 1973, pp. 2 0 -2 1 , quoted by Grey, 1988). …”
Section: Sullivan's Legacy Regarding the Problem Of Structurementioning
confidence: 95%
“…And then set all this in the context of the mainstream psychoanalytic theory of Sullivan's era, according to which, in the eyes of at least some analysts, "Re lationships as such are not real; a psychology can be complete without considering more than the individual apparatus and events within it, plus the general class of external stimuli" (Holt, 1973, pp. 2 0 -2 1 , quoted by Grey, 1988). …”
Section: Sullivan's Legacy Regarding the Problem Of Structurementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Alan Grey, in his recent article "Sullivan's contribution to psy choanalysis: An overview" discussed the treatment of Sullivan's ideas in the current orthodox psychoanalytic literature (Grey, 1988). I will expand upon his quotation from Cooper (1985, p. 11):…”
Section: Misattributíon Of the Concept Of Participant Observationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This trend has particular relevance for the In terpersonal approach which has had such a pervasive, but largely unacknowledged, influence on psychoanalytic praxis and theory. Many Interpersonal concepts, ideas, and practices have been adopted or incorporated, in part or in whole, into the analytic 2 See, for example, the differing perspectives of Antonovsky (1987), Bromberg (1989), Chrzanowski (1977), Crowley (1972), Gill (1983), Greenberg & Mitchell (1983), Grey (1988), Havens (1976), Held-Weiss (1984), Hirsch (1987), Kwawer (1981), Levenson (1985), Mitchell (1986), Monroe (1955), Thompson (1950), Ticho (1978), Witenberg & Caligor (1967), Wolstein (1977aWolstein ( , 1977b, and Zucker (1989).…”
Section: The Uniquely Interpersonalmentioning
confidence: 99%