2018
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur trioxide formation/emissions in coal‐fired air‐ and oxy‐fuel combustion processes: a review

Abstract: In oxy‐fuel combustion, fuel is burned using oxygen together with recycled flue gas, which is needed to control the combustion temperature. This leads to higher concentrations of sulfur dioxide and sulfur trioxide in the recycled gas, which can result in the formation of sulfuric acid and enhanced corrosion. Current experimental data on SO3 formation, reaction mechanisms, and mathematical modelling have indicated significant differences in SO3 formation between air‐ and oxy‐fuel combustion for both the wet and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(420 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, severe weather conditions will further aggravate pollution. 39 O 3 has a negative correlation between the concentration of NO 2 and CO, which is consistent with the previous findings, i.e. , these pollutants, similar to some other volatile organic compounds, are considered as the chemical precursors of O 3 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Meanwhile, severe weather conditions will further aggravate pollution. 39 O 3 has a negative correlation between the concentration of NO 2 and CO, which is consistent with the previous findings, i.e. , these pollutants, similar to some other volatile organic compounds, are considered as the chemical precursors of O 3 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…SO 3 is mainly formed from the oxidation of SO 2 during the stage of coal combustion and subsequent processes. The generated SO 3 in coal-fired boilers can corrode facilities and produce fouling, which is more pronounced when the temperature of flue gas is below acid dew point. Generally, through the subsequent air pollutant control devices (APCDs), SO 3 concentrations can be exacerbated or mitigated. Especially, the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system widely installed in CFPPs can oxidize SO 2 to SO 3 under the action of the catalyst while removing NO x . , Most of the other APCDs present a significant difference on SO 3 removal, depending on their respective processing characteristics. ,,, Zhang et al investigated the removal efficiencies of SO 3 by different APCDs and routes, and the results ranged from 27 to 94% with great variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To satisfy the increasingly stringent emission standards, some adjustments to the treatment methods must be made regularly, including mechanical add-ons, activated carbon injection to adsorb heavy metals and organic pollutants, a wet scrubbing tower, and ultra-fine atomization through venturi pump technology to further eliminate SO 2 and PM2.5 [33]. Finally, an end-of-pipe treatment device will again be added to further remove mercury, SO 3 , sulfuric acid, aerosols, and PM2.5 among other pollutants to satisfy the expected arrival of even stricter emission standards [8,34,35]. The catalytic mechanism of ozone deep oxidation into gaseous pollutants was also proposed.…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%