1964
DOI: 10.1364/josa.54.000498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur Sensitization and High-Intensity Reciprocity Failure of Silver Bromide Grains*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is proposed here that the photoproduced Ag clusters become Auplated in the developer, in the same way as during Au-latensification. This picture would explain why the same sensitivity to flash exposures is often obtained in both cases and also why S -b Au sensitization probably yields the same distribution of li centers as S sensitization (5,16). Spencer and Atwell concluded already that the function of Au in S § Au sensitization must be very similar to the one in Au latensification (16).…”
Section: Discussion Lmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It is proposed here that the photoproduced Ag clusters become Auplated in the developer, in the same way as during Au-latensification. This picture would explain why the same sensitivity to flash exposures is often obtained in both cases and also why S -b Au sensitization probably yields the same distribution of li centers as S sensitization (5,16). Spencer and Atwell concluded already that the function of Au in S § Au sensitization must be very similar to the one in Au latensification (16).…”
Section: Discussion Lmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A further consequence of using a high-intensity exposure is the production of a high proportion of latent-image specks which require a long time of contact with the developer before the rate of the reduction process becomes significant. Because of this the time of development to reach maximum response is longer for short-duration high-intensity exposures than for exposures of longer duration and lower intensity (Spencer & Atwell, 1964). The parallelism between electron and high-intensity light exposures is maintained in this respect.…”
Section: T H E P H O T O G R a P H I C E M U L S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of recording with nanosecond pulse radiation in such layers [1,2], a substantial decrease (by a factor of up to 20) in the diffraction efficiency and light sensitivity is observed. The effect of lowering the speed of silver halide photosensitive materials at short high-intensity exposures (reciprocity failure) is known and it has been described in some works [3][4][5][6].As we showed earlier [7,8], one of the possibilities of enhancing the sensitivity of photographic materials to pulse radiation is increasing the silver halide grain size. However, the diffraction efficiency considerably declines in this case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of recording with nanosecond pulse radiation in such layers [1,2], a substantial decrease (by a factor of up to 20) in the diffraction efficiency and light sensitivity is observed. The effect of lowering the speed of silver halide photosensitive materials at short high-intensity exposures (reciprocity failure) is known and it has been described in some works [3][4][5][6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%