2020
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur-Modified Coated Slow-Release Fertilizer Based on Castor Oil: Synthesis and a Controlled-Release Model

Abstract: There has been advancement in the preparation of coated slow-release fertilizer, but problems remain, such as a complex production process, high production costs, and uncontrollable nutrient release. Herein, a new interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) for coating urea was prepared with inexpensive castor oil via a one-pot method. Considering the low strength of oil-based materials, sulfur was used as a reinforcing material to synthesize the interpenetrating network. After prepolymerization, the material stren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The HHV of RWS (21.01 MJ/kg) was higher than that of SS (13.98 MJ/kg), RWS50:SS50 (17.01 MJ/kg), and RWS75:SS25 (19.01 MJ/kg). The HHV of RWS, SS, RWS50:SS50, and RWS75:SS25 was higher than the HHV of other studies, such as that of the trunk (17.85 MJ/kg), branches (190.3 MJ/kg), and bark (20 MJ/kg), but lower than for phyllodes (21 MJ/kg) [39]. In comparison to petroleum feedstock fuels (Figure 3), such as natural gas (50.84 MJ/kg), gasoline (46.94 MJ/kg), diesel (45.60 MJ/kg), and kerosene (45.99 MJ/kg), the HHV of RWS, SS, RWS50:SS50, and RWS75:SS25 was lower than that of petroleum feedstocks [43].…”
Section: Hhv and Lhv Energy Comparison With Fossil Fuelscontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The HHV of RWS (21.01 MJ/kg) was higher than that of SS (13.98 MJ/kg), RWS50:SS50 (17.01 MJ/kg), and RWS75:SS25 (19.01 MJ/kg). The HHV of RWS, SS, RWS50:SS50, and RWS75:SS25 was higher than the HHV of other studies, such as that of the trunk (17.85 MJ/kg), branches (190.3 MJ/kg), and bark (20 MJ/kg), but lower than for phyllodes (21 MJ/kg) [39]. In comparison to petroleum feedstock fuels (Figure 3), such as natural gas (50.84 MJ/kg), gasoline (46.94 MJ/kg), diesel (45.60 MJ/kg), and kerosene (45.99 MJ/kg), the HHV of RWS, SS, RWS50:SS50, and RWS75:SS25 was lower than that of petroleum feedstocks [43].…”
Section: Hhv and Lhv Energy Comparison With Fossil Fuelscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The moisture content of RWS (5.38 wt.%) and SS (6.60 wt.%) was lower than th moisture content of corn straw (7.55 wt.%), whereas the VM and FC content of RWS (77.4 wt.% and 17.50 wt.%, respectively) were slightly lower than that of the corn-straw feed stock [38]. However, the VM content of RWS (77.47 wt.%) was higher than that of phy lodes (69.03 wt.%) and trunks (67.66 wt.%) [39]. Therefore, the results of our study demon strated better percentages of organic compounds and could produce a suitable amount o liquid yield.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of castor oil as a polyol in combination with the previously mentioned sulfur crosslinking strategy was employed to produce high strength vulcanized polyurethane interpenetrating polymer networks. Thus, castor oil was vulcanized with sulfur and subsequently polymerized with polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate, forming a coating for the slow release of a urea-based fertilizer [ 66 ]. Various synthetic tools can be employed for the production of polyols from other unsaturated vegetable oils.…”
Section: Branched and Crosslinked Polymers Based On Pristine Or Chemically Modified Triglyceridesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In recent years, slow release fertilizers have been developed to control the release rate of plant nutrients into the soil medium, which minimizes the loss of fertilizer nutrients. 4–8 On the other hand, the emerging nanotechnology field has contributed to the production of slow release nanofertilizers incorporating nanoscale nutrient particles and nanomaterials to hold plant nutrients, which is even more effective than conventional polymer-coated slow release fertilizers. 9–12 In general, nano-fertilizers are prepared by encapsulating plant nutrients such as urea inside nanoporous matrices or as a nanoparticle or nanoemulsions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%