2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur isotopic fractionation and source appointment of PM2.5 in Nanjing region around the second session of the Youth Olympic Games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Dai et al [61] showed direct evidence of sulfate emission from residential coal combustion present in particulate matter from Xian, China. Guo et al [62] stated that one of the major sources of atmospheric sulfate is attributed to vehicle exhaust. Anthropogenic sulfate from fossil fuel combustion can be included in primary and secondary sulfate.…”
Section: Water-soluble Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Dai et al [61] showed direct evidence of sulfate emission from residential coal combustion present in particulate matter from Xian, China. Guo et al [62] stated that one of the major sources of atmospheric sulfate is attributed to vehicle exhaust. Anthropogenic sulfate from fossil fuel combustion can be included in primary and secondary sulfate.…”
Section: Water-soluble Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable sulfur isotopes (δ 34 S) have the potential to indicate the formation pathways of sulfate aerosols. The fractionation factors for sulfur isotopes during multiple oxidation pathways (SO 2 + OH, SO 2 + H 2 O 2 /O 3 , and TMI) have been determined experimentally. Yet, to date, there are few studies using sulfate δ 34 S values to interpret the oxidation pathways of SO 2 . ,, This is because the δ 34 S values of sulfate aerosols (δ 34 S sulfate ) are simultaneously controlled by the δ 34 S values of SO 2 sources , (δ 34 S emission ) and the kinetic and equilibrium isotope effects occurring during the oxidation process. The δ 34 S emission values strongly depend on the origin of SO 2 and can, therefore, be difficult to constrain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This isotopic fractionation during SO 2 oxidation should be treated as a Rayleigh distillation process since isotopic exchange between the product sulfate and the reactant SO 2 is minimal . Currently, many studies have measured δ 34 S sulfate in Chinese megacities ,, to understand the sources of atmospheric SO 2 and the secondary sulfate aerosols. Some works also have measured δ 33 S and δ 36 S to further constrain the origins of atmospheric SO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation of formation mechanisms in atmospheric sulfate aerosols gives us a hint to better understand the sulfate budget, linked to climate changes on regional and/or global scales. Oxygen isotopic compositions, such as δ 18 O and Δ 17 O, are frequently used to identify the mechanisms of formation of sulfate aerosols, whereas δ 34 S was considered to be attributed to the different SO 2 emission sources. , For example, the δ 34 S value of DMS was in the range of +15–19‰, while most anthropogenic sulfate displayed much lower δ 34 S values such as that from coal combustion (+6.6 ± 3‰) and traffic emissions (+5.8 ± 3.0‰). Obviously, the different emission sources result in the different δ 34 S values in sulfate aerosols. Nevertheless, several recent studies used δ 34 S values to quantify the relative contributions of the different oxidation pathways from SO 2 to sulfate. ,, In the conversion of SO 2 and SO 4 2– , the isotope fractionation effects would be produced through different oxidation pathways such as OH, NO 2 , H 2 O 2 , O 3 , and O 2 catalyzed by TMIs, resulting in different signatures of δ 34 S in sulfate aerosols (δ 34 S-SO 4 2– ). , Oxidation by H 2 O 2 and O 3 produced sulfate with enriched 34 S (+15.1–19.9‰) relative to the reactant SO 2 , whereas sulfate formed by TMI catalysis depleted 34 S values (−9.5 ± 3.1‰) relative to SO 2 . In general, δ 34 S in atmospheric sulfate aerosols is definitely influenced by both the oxidation pathways and the emission sources, and the influence exhibits seasonal and geographic variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%