2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur Isotope Anomalies (Δ33S) in Urban Air Pollution Linked to Mineral-Dust-Associated Sulfate

Abstract: Sulfate aerosols exert a net cooling effect on the earth-atmosphere system, yet their radiative forcing remains associated with largest of uncertainties in the assessment of climate change. One of the contributing factors is the poor understanding of the sulfate formation pathways, which are thought to be following mostly the mass-dependent fractionation model (i.e., Δ 33 S ~ 0). However, globally, urban sulfate aerosols exhibit significant non-zero Δ 33 S compositions (from -0.6‰ to +0.6‰), resulting in sulfu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(234 reference statements)
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, uncertainties of δ 34 S, Δ 33 S, and Δ 36 S measurements attributed to the full procedure (including reduction, fluorination, purification, and IRMS measurements) are estimated to be 0.40, 0.064, and 0.20‰, respectively. Given Δ 33 S anomalies in aerosols are usually larger than 0.1‰, the error in Δ 33 S (0.064‰) due to the Thode solution reduction step in this study using the IRMS method, which remains lower than the multicollector-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (MC-ICPMS) method (∼0.1‰), , would neither affect our data interpretation nor change our conclusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, uncertainties of δ 34 S, Δ 33 S, and Δ 36 S measurements attributed to the full procedure (including reduction, fluorination, purification, and IRMS measurements) are estimated to be 0.40, 0.064, and 0.20‰, respectively. Given Δ 33 S anomalies in aerosols are usually larger than 0.1‰, the error in Δ 33 S (0.064‰) due to the Thode solution reduction step in this study using the IRMS method, which remains lower than the multicollector-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (MC-ICPMS) method (∼0.1‰), , would neither affect our data interpretation nor change our conclusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The prediction that heterogeneous sulfate formation leads to negative Δ 33 S values appears supported by subsequent findings of negative Δ 33 S values in black crust sulfate (Figure ), which was formed via SO 2 oxidation on carbonate building stones. , A magnetic isotope effect was further speculated given the decoupled Δ 33 S/Δ 36 S relationship, but the deep mechanism is not explicitly discussed. , Magnetic isotope effects that arise from spin-selective reactions are usually linked to radical pair reactions. , It remains unclear where the radical pair reaction is involved in the formation of black crust sulfate. Most recently, new studies of aerosol collected at India and open oceans argue that heterogeneous sulfate formation on mineral surface results in positive Δ 33 S values, , in contrast to previous arguments (negative Δ 33 S values). In addition, the correlation between Δ 33 S and mineral dusts highly depends on the selection of mineral dust tracers. For example, although Δ 33 S values of India aerosol samples correlate with Fe/Al, such a relationship is not observed between Δ 33 S and Ca 2+ , similar to our work and other studies (Figure S4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Evidence of S-MIF has been found in aerosol samples in present-day polluted urban and semi-urban environments ( 47–50 ). In such locations, mineral-dust-associated sulfate has been proposed to exhibit S-MIF ( 47 , 50 ), yet inherent mechanism(s) remain unclear and highly speculative. However, no such dust events have ever been reported for the period studied here ( 54 ), as also evidenced from the record of calcium concentrations (a marker for dust) in our dataset ( Figure S1a ; see the “Methods” section as well).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%