Marine Geochemistry
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-32144-6_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur Cycling and Methane Oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
229
1
2

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
12
229
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the modeling predicts elevated pyrite contents that are limited to the sulfidic zone, coinciding with a strong decrease in magnetic susceptibility . Similar observations are also reported for other iron-dominated areas such as the Amazon Fan (Jørgensen and Kasten, 2006), Zambesi Fan (März et al, 2008) or cold-seep systems off southwestern Taiwan (Hsu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Pyrite Formation At the Center Of The Sulfidic Zonesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Specifically, the modeling predicts elevated pyrite contents that are limited to the sulfidic zone, coinciding with a strong decrease in magnetic susceptibility . Similar observations are also reported for other iron-dominated areas such as the Amazon Fan (Jørgensen and Kasten, 2006), Zambesi Fan (März et al, 2008) or cold-seep systems off southwestern Taiwan (Hsu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Pyrite Formation At the Center Of The Sulfidic Zonesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In general, aerobic metabolism dominates the organic matter mineralization in deep-sea sediments that are characterized by low organic matter content (Jahnke et al, 1982;Glud, 2008), especially in organic-carbon-starved deep-sea sediments with low sedimentation rates (Mewes et al, 2014D'Hondt et al, 2015;Mogollón et al, 2016). In contrast, owing to high sulfate concentrations in marine sediment, sulfate reduction might account for up to 50 % of total carbon oxidation in continental margins with high organic matter flux (Jørgensen, 1982;Jørgensen and Kasten, 2006;Bowles et al, 2014). However, in sediments where manganese and iron oxides are abundant or rapidly recycled, microbial reduction of manganese and iron can be the dominant electron-accepting processes over sulfate reduction (Sørensen and Jørgensen, 1987;Aller, 1990;Canfield et al, 1993b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-existence of methanogenesis and sulfate reduction is not normally observed because sulfate reduction is more energetically favorable than methanogenesis, and sulfate reducers should outcompete methanogens for common substrates such as hydrogen and acetate (Oremland and Polcin, 1982;Jørgensen and Kasten, 2006). Moreover, anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) coupled with sulfate reduction at the base of the sulfate reducing zone should further deplete methane (Capone and Kiene, 1988;Valentine and Reeburgh, 2000).…”
Section: Co-existence Of Methane and Sulfate In Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%