2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2014.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur-controlled iron isotope fractionation experiments of core formation in planetary bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not observed in experimental studies and in natural samples for which metal-silicate equilibrium was assessed (Roskosz et al, 2006;Poitrasson et al, 2009;Hin et al, 2012;Jordan and Young, 2014;Shahar et al, 2015).…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This is not observed in experimental studies and in natural samples for which metal-silicate equilibrium was assessed (Roskosz et al, 2006;Poitrasson et al, 2009;Hin et al, 2012;Jordan and Young, 2014;Shahar et al, 2015).…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…), although recent estimates based on Fe isotopes places an upper limit of ~8 wt% S in the core (Shahar et al. ). The unknown S abundance, or other potential light elements in the core, has an important influence on the density and inferred radius of the Martian core (Mocquet et al.…”
Section: Current State Of Knowledge Related To Specific Volatilesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…More importantly, fractionation of Fe isotopes between S-rich metallic melts and silicates becomes much less detectable with increasing temperature, and is usually supposed negligible considering our present level of precision, above 1250 • C as determined through experimental studies (Poitrasson et al, 2009;Hin et al, 2012). [Notice that this view has been recently challenged by Shahar et al (2015) whose results indicate significant fractionations between metallic melts and melted silicates at 1600 • C. However, the magnitude and direction of these isotopic fractionations are not consistent with the available analyses on magmatic irons (bulk samples) and the results presented here. A discussion of these results and previous ones is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Origin Of the High δ 56 Fe Values In Ureilitesmentioning
confidence: 99%