2017
DOI: 10.3171/2016.8.jns161197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulforaphane suppresses the growth of glioblastoma cells, glioblastoma stem cell–like spheroids, and tumor xenografts through multiple cell signaling pathways

Abstract: Objective Defects in the apoptotic machinery and augmented survival signals contribute to drug resistance in glioblastoma (GBM). Moreover, another complexity related to GBM treatment is the concept that GBM development and recurrence may arise from the expression of GBM stem cells (GSCs). Therefore, the use of a multifaceted approach or multitargeted agents that affect specific tumor cell characteristics will likely be necessary to successfully eradicate GBM. The objective of this study was to investigate the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These sulfur-rich compounds are hydrolyzed by the plant endogenous enzyme, myrosinase, to release an active compound, sulforaphane (11). Recently, sulforaphane has been shown to target the self-renewal properties of CSCs in a variety of cancer types including skin, breast, pancreatic, and glioblastoma (12)(13)(14)(15). Despite the increasing evidence and interest shown in modulating effects of sulforaphane on CSCs and their involvement with the early development of tumor formation, limited data is available for the utility of sulforaphane to prevent the CSC-mediated processes of tumor development and maintenance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sulfur-rich compounds are hydrolyzed by the plant endogenous enzyme, myrosinase, to release an active compound, sulforaphane (11). Recently, sulforaphane has been shown to target the self-renewal properties of CSCs in a variety of cancer types including skin, breast, pancreatic, and glioblastoma (12)(13)(14)(15). Despite the increasing evidence and interest shown in modulating effects of sulforaphane on CSCs and their involvement with the early development of tumor formation, limited data is available for the utility of sulforaphane to prevent the CSC-mediated processes of tumor development and maintenance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain why the AZ + SFN combination would be most effective as a therapeutic regimen we offer the following. Recent studies support SFN as a potent antitumor agent against multiple signaling pathways in diverse cancers and targeting of mitochondrial functions where normal cells are protected [45][46][47][48][49][50]. Expression of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) is highly relevant to rapidly growing and aggressive tumor cells adapting to the acidic microenvironment in rapidly growing tumors in order to maintain a more intracellular physiological pH, and thus inhibitors of CAIX can potently inhibit tumor cell viability [51,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that ITC compounds play key roles in inhibiting cancer, motivating their potential clinical use, including in combination therapies. Recently, Bijangi et al made an encouraging discovery that sulforaphane reduces the survival of GBM cells, glioblastoma stem-cell-like spheroids, and tumor xenografts through multiple cell signaling pathways and that this treatment does not affect the survival of normal human brain cells or normal human MSCs in both the cellular and animal experiments [43]. This study helps us better understand the mechanism of action of SFN and its analogs in tumor cells and can guides future clinical applications that utilize the degradation of tubulin by SFN analogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%