1992
DOI: 10.3354/meps086167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfide detoxification and tolerance in Halicryptus spinulosus (Priapulida): a multiple strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(48 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Caron and Jackson ; Zhao et al . ), even though their modern macroscopic counterparts are in general restricted to marginal, typically anaerobic settings (van der Land ; Oeschger and Vetter ). The most familiar and prolific Cambrian priapulid is perhaps Ottoia , best known from the Burgess Shale Lagerstätte (Cambrian Series 3, Stage 5; British Columbia) (Lieberman ; Caron and Jackson ; Vannier ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Caron and Jackson ; Zhao et al . ), even though their modern macroscopic counterparts are in general restricted to marginal, typically anaerobic settings (van der Land ; Oeschger and Vetter ). The most familiar and prolific Cambrian priapulid is perhaps Ottoia , best known from the Burgess Shale Lagerstätte (Cambrian Series 3, Stage 5; British Columbia) (Lieberman ; Caron and Jackson ; Vannier ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some animals from sulfiderich aquatic sediments, such as the gutless clam (Solemya reidi) and the lugworm (Arenicola marina) are able to oxidize sulfide within their own tissues without the aid of bacterial symbionts (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). This capacity allows them to detoxify sulfide that enters their bodies from the surrounding environment that would otherwise poison aerobic metabolism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may suggest that the bulk of H 2 S is detoxified peripherally in the gills (rather than the liver as in other vertebrates; Dorman et al, 2002), potentially shielding internal organs from the toxic effects. Some organisms exposed to H 2 S in marine environments have also been hypothesized to sequester sulphide peripherally in external mucosa in order to minimize toxic effects (Goffredi, Jones, Erhlich, Springer, & Vrijenhoek, 2008;Oeschger & Vetter, 1992). In addition, modification of the integumentary system may be common during exposure to environmental stressors in general (Ao et al, 2015;Micallef et al, 2012).…”
Section: Expression Variation Among Organs and Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%