2021
DOI: 10.1002/yea.3553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfate transport mutants affect hydrogen sulfide and sulfite production during alcoholic fermentation

Abstract: Hydrogen sulfide is a common wine fault, with a rotten-egg odour, which is directly related to yeast metabolism in response to nitrogen and sulfur availability. In grape juice, sulfate is the most abundant inorganic sulfur compound, which is taken up by yeast through two high-affinity sulfate transporters, Sul1p and Sul2p, and a low affinity transporter, Soa1p. Sulfate contributes to H 2 S production under nitrogen limitation, by being reduced via the Sulfur Assimilation Pathway (SAP). Therefore, yeast strains… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent study, Walker and co-authors [65] used CRISPR-Cas9 system to introduce selected mutations in SUL1 and SUL2 genes in wine strains EC1118. These genes encoded two high-affinity sulfate transporters.…”
Section: Wine Yeasts Genome Editing By Crispr-cas9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, Walker and co-authors [65] used CRISPR-Cas9 system to introduce selected mutations in SUL1 and SUL2 genes in wine strains EC1118. These genes encoded two high-affinity sulfate transporters.…”
Section: Wine Yeasts Genome Editing By Crispr-cas9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutant strain has very similar organoleptic and processing properties to the parent except for greatly reduced hydrogen sulfide production and higher total sulfite production. More recent work in this area using similar methods resulted in the isolation of strains with both reduced hydrogen sulfite and sulfur dioxide (Walker et al 2021 ). Further examples of mutagenesis-derived yeast include AWRI/Maurivin's Rosa and Rosa Intense yeast strains, where a strategy to screen for novel mutants that overproduce ‘floral’ aroma compounds 2-phenylethanol and 2-phenylethyl acetate was used (Cordente et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Modern Yeast Strain Improvement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the first sought to decrease urea production and thus reduce the risk of ethyl carbamate accumulation by modification of the arginine permease gene ( CAN1 ) (DiCarlo et al 2013 , Vigentini et al 2017 ), or to increase rose/honey like aromas by increasing production of phenylethyl acetate (Trindade de Carvalho et al 2017 ). Subsequently, others have increased fermentation speed by deletion of the high affinity phosphodiesterase ( PDE2 ) (Vallejo et al 2020 ), decreased accumulation of unpleasant hydrogen sulfide (Walker et al 2021 ), improved fermentation efficiency in low nitrogen fermentations (Lang et al 2021 ), improved utilisation of proline, as an alternate nitrogen source not normally metabolised under wine conditions (Luo et al 2018 ), and reduced growth rate to encourage growth of competing (but desirable) yeasts through modification of S ER1 (Lang et al 2022 ). This technology is also being used to better understand spoilage organisms and the role of sulfite tolerance in Brettanomyces with deletion of the sulfite permease ( SSU1 ) (Varela et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Modern Yeast Strain Improvement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their apparent simplicity, the traits to be improved are not always easy to select phenotypically. There are some classic examples collected in a review by Snow (1983), and more recent examples of improvement, by indirect selection, of nitrogen source utilisation (Salmon and Barre, 1998; Long et al ., 2018), mannoprotein release (Quirós et al ., 2010), reduction of SH 2 and SO 2 production (Cordente et al ., 2009; Walker et al ., 2021), or reduction of volatile acidity (Cordente et al ., 2013). Direct mutant selection has been used to improve autolysis (Gonzalez et al ., 2003; Giovani and Rosi, 2007), or the release of mannoproteins (Gonzalez‐Ramos et al ., 2010).…”
Section: Genetic Improvement Of Wine Yeastsmentioning
confidence: 99%