2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfate reduction and filtration performances of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A study was conducted by Sahinkaya, Yurtsever, Isler, Coban, and Aktaş (2018) to evaluate the performance of sulfate-reducing anaerobic MBRs (AnMBRs) and investigate the membrane foulants and filtration characteristics. Results showed that sulfate-reducing AnMBR offers potential for real scale applications.…”
Section: Membrane Treatment Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study was conducted by Sahinkaya, Yurtsever, Isler, Coban, and Aktaş (2018) to evaluate the performance of sulfate-reducing anaerobic MBRs (AnMBRs) and investigate the membrane foulants and filtration characteristics. Results showed that sulfate-reducing AnMBR offers potential for real scale applications.…”
Section: Membrane Treatment Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muhammad et al 6 showed that under suitable conditions, SRB could survive in the environment containing sulfate and various metal ions, and the reduction reaction could reduce 87–100% of iron, lead, copper, zinc and aluminum. Sahinkaya et al 7 found that the final sulfate reduction rate could reach 90% in a sulfate-reducing MBR reactor when SRB was inoculated into wastewater with a sulfate concentration of 2000 mg/L and a COD/sulfate of 0.75. SRB is a prokaryote living in anaerobic environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results manifested that the degree of membrane fouling was identified based on the predictive values which have better accuracy than that of the mechanism model. Although soft-computing methods have achieved great success on warning membrane fouling, they are incompetent to deal with the uncertainties arising from dynamic environment, incomplete and noisy data, imprecise measurements, etc., which often make-early warning results inconsistent and subjective [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%