1994
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1994.39.4.0797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfate reduction and diffusion in sediments of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin

Abstract: Rates of sulfate diffusion and reduction were measured in sediments of Little Rock Lake, an oligotrophic, soft-water lake in northern Wisconsin. Laboratory measurements of kinetics of sulfate reduction found half-saturation constants (20-30 pmol liter-I) and Q10 values (2.6) similar to values reported in the literature. Sulfate reduction under in situ conditions in sediment cores was limited by sulfate and followed similar uptake kinetics as in laboratory experiments. Some variation in kinetic parameters was e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
52
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
52
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation that SO 4 2 -diffusion accounted for <10% of the SO 4 2 -demand at MB during the springsummer transition (May to July), and a larger proportion (30 to 50%) during early spring and late fall (Fig. 7), was similar to an earlier report in which depth-integrated benthic SR exceeded modeled diffusive influx of SO 4 2 - (Urban et al 1994). The balance of the SO 4 2 -needed to fuel SR can only be supplied by advective transport and/or by S-recycling.…”
Section: Sulfate Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The observation that SO 4 2 -diffusion accounted for <10% of the SO 4 2 -demand at MB during the springsummer transition (May to July), and a larger proportion (30 to 50%) during early spring and late fall (Fig. 7), was similar to an earlier report in which depth-integrated benthic SR exceeded modeled diffusive influx of SO 4 2 - (Urban et al 1994). The balance of the SO 4 2 -needed to fuel SR can only be supplied by advective transport and/or by S-recycling.…”
Section: Sulfate Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Although other factors may contribute to this difference, as discussed for the offset in modeled and measured AOM rates above, the difference was much larger than for AOM. Indeed, it seems typical for freshwater sediments that directly measured rates of SR substantially exceed those supported by diffusion, and this has been attributed to rapid reoxidation of sulfide (Urban et al 1994). The mechanisms of reoxidation could involve cycles of abiotic oxidation of sulfide to elemental sulfur with Fe(III) oxide coupled to disproportionation of sulfur to sulfide and SO 2{ 4 (Thamdrup et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing diffusive fluxes of nutrients and inorganic carbon with increasing water depth have been reported previously by Carignan and Lean (1991) for a mesotrophic lake, but 13 Porewater profiles from dialysis samplers Sherman et al (1994) did not observe such a phenomenon in an oligotrophic lake. In L. Vechten oxygen consumption rates are higher in pelagic than in littoral sediments (Sweerts et al, 1991), but diffusive fluxes of sulfate and nitrate have been reported to be similar in littoral and pelagic sediments (Cook et al, 1986Urban et al, 1994).…”
Section: Spatial Variationmentioning
confidence: 98%