2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfate-reducing and methanogenic microbial community responses during anaerobic digestion of tannery effluent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The curve of treatment CSO4 is of great interest, because the methane production does not seem to be affected by the high sulfate concentration during the first days of the experiment, since it follows the same trend as C0. This further supports that the direct inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate is minor but causes indirect inhibition by the growth of SRB that outcompete methanogens, resulting in reduced methane production, as aforementioned [38]. After the first 8 days, a sudden dramatic decrease was observed in the daily methane production of CSO4, probably as a result of the inhibition caused by the hydrogen sulfide produced and the antagonistic growth of SRB against the methanogenic cultures.…”
Section: Anaerobic Process Under High Ammonia and Sulfate Concentrati...supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The curve of treatment CSO4 is of great interest, because the methane production does not seem to be affected by the high sulfate concentration during the first days of the experiment, since it follows the same trend as C0. This further supports that the direct inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate is minor but causes indirect inhibition by the growth of SRB that outcompete methanogens, resulting in reduced methane production, as aforementioned [38]. After the first 8 days, a sudden dramatic decrease was observed in the daily methane production of CSO4, probably as a result of the inhibition caused by the hydrogen sulfide produced and the antagonistic growth of SRB against the methanogenic cultures.…”
Section: Anaerobic Process Under High Ammonia and Sulfate Concentrati...supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The AS fertilizer at a 500 kg ha -1 rate reduced CH4 emissions by 31.4 g m -2 h -1 and was 25% lower than the 250 kg ha -1 urea rate (Nugroho et al, 1994). Minamikawa et al (2005) and Kibangou et al (2022) stated that N fertilizers containing sulfate (AS) could produce methanogenic bacteria to compete with sulfate-reducing bacteria for hydrogen, thus inhibiting CH4 formation. Meanwhile, without N fertilizer, CH4 emissions were quite high (113.48 kg ha -1 season -1 ).…”
Section: Methane Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were then stimulated during the aeration of the Eco-flush™ reactor. Kibangou et al [24] observed the presence of bacteria and methanogenic archaea in raw tannery wastewater sampled from a balancing tank. Nonetheless, a good combination of anaerobic, anoxic, and aerobic processes is required for the biological removal of nutrients (N and P) [23].…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Biological Pre-treatment Performancementioning
confidence: 99%