1997
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulcal, ventricular, and white matter changes at MR imaging in the aging brain: data from the cardiovascular health study.

Abstract: Sulcal width, ventricular size, and white matter signal intensity change with age, sex, and race. Knowledge of these changes is important in appropriate interpretation of MR images of the elderly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
223
2
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
223
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 compares VBR computed by the automated method on the cross-sectional pool to the visual ratings of ventricular dilation that were part of the CHS clinical evaluation. Details of the visual rating scale have been described previously [47]. In short, trained neuroradiologists assigned each MR scan an integer score between 1 and 9, with lower scores corresponding to relatively small ventricles and higher scores corresponding to relatively large ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 compares VBR computed by the automated method on the cross-sectional pool to the visual ratings of ventricular dilation that were part of the CHS clinical evaluation. Details of the visual rating scale have been described previously [47]. In short, trained neuroradiologists assigned each MR scan an integer score between 1 and 9, with lower scores corresponding to relatively small ventricles and higher scores corresponding to relatively large ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A white matter hyperintensity (WMH) score was determined by grading the extent of increased white matter signal intensity on the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence images in the periventricular and subcortical white matter area. The grading was based on a 10-point scale (0 to 9), with a higher score indicating more severe white matter grade [32,36]. An example of WMH grading in control subjects and patients with MSA is illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WMH ratings were based on a system developed for the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS; Bryan, et al 1994;Yue, et al 1997). A numerical rating for the WMHs was assigned by the comparison of each subject's imaging data to predefined CHS visual standards and representative of progressive severity within a 10-point scale (0 through 9).…”
Section: White Matter Hyperintensity Ratingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rater assigns each MR image a WMH severity score based on its visual similarity to 'prototype' MR images. Typical scales range from low to high severity using 4-point or 10-point scales (Fazekas, et al 1987;Bryan, et al 1994;Yue, et al 1997). This method requires subjective judgment; it describes the WMHs through 4 or 10 crude grades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%