2019
DOI: 10.21079/11681/32347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suitability of introduced Nymphoides spp. (Nymphoides cristata, N. peltata) as targets for biological control in the United States

Abstract: This technical note summarizes the results of a scoping study to determine whether the introduced Nymphoides cristata and N. peltata are suitable targets for classical biological control in the United States. A thorough literature review of biology, management, and impacts of both Nymphoides spp. was conducted, and the standard Peschkin-McClay scoring system was applied to assess their suitability as classical biological control targets. Scores from independent reviewers were averaged; 146 for N. cristata and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since mechanical harvesting results in plant material breaking off during removal, mechanical control is not a suitable management option because CFH and similar species can propagate through fragmentation (i.e., when stems/leaves break off a parent plant to form new plants) [12]. While biological control development is recommended and being investigated for CFH, it is not yet a viable control strategy [17]. Thus, herbicide control is the primary management method for CFH and related FLAV species.…”
Section: Aquatic Vegetation Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since mechanical harvesting results in plant material breaking off during removal, mechanical control is not a suitable management option because CFH and similar species can propagate through fragmentation (i.e., when stems/leaves break off a parent plant to form new plants) [12]. While biological control development is recommended and being investigated for CFH, it is not yet a viable control strategy [17]. Thus, herbicide control is the primary management method for CFH and related FLAV species.…”
Section: Aquatic Vegetation Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some invasive lineages can vary in their response to herbicides (e.g., Netherland and Willey 2017;Chorak and Thum 2020). Moreover, the genetic makeup of invasive spe-cies may be important for identifying welladapted biocontrol agents in the source region (Blossey et al 1994;Williams et al 2018;Harms and Nachtrieb 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive N. peltata populations often are managed with a mixture of herbicide and mechanical removal treatments, and biological control options are being evaluated (Harms and Nachtrieb 2019). One instance of natural damage from the fungus Septoria villarsiae has been reported in Maine (De Souza et al 2021), and this or other herbivorous or pathogenic species could become feasible on a larger scale (Harms and Nachtrieb 2019). Like many aquatic plant species, N. peltata can reproduce both asexually and sexually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herbicides are a popular method, however, the use of chemicals can have adverse effects on non-target species in the ecosystem (Madsen 2000). Biological controls use a host-speci c organism that targets the invasive plant to suppress its growth and spread (Harms and Nachtrieb 2019). The interaction between the plant and its natural enemy is the central determining factor for expanding or controlling the spread of the plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%