2016
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-4-425-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suitability of ground-based SfM–MVS for monitoring glacial and periglacial processes

Abstract: Abstract. Photo-based surface reconstruction is rapidly emerging as an alternative survey technique to lidar (light detection and ranging) in many fields of geoscience fostered by the recent development of computer vision algorithms such as structure from motion (SfM) and dense image matching such as multi-view stereo (MVS). The objectives of this work are to test the suitability of the ground-based SfM-MVS approach for calculating the geodetic mass balance of a 2.1 km 2 glacier and for detecting the surface d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work by Piermattei et al (2016) demonstrates the advantages and potential of SfM to calculate the geodetic mass balance of glacier in the Ortles-Cevedale Group, Eastern Italian Alps. In addition, they investigated the feasibility of using the image-based approach for the detection of the surface displacement rate of an active rock glacier.…”
Section: Research and Innovative Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The work by Piermattei et al (2016) demonstrates the advantages and potential of SfM to calculate the geodetic mass balance of glacier in the Ortles-Cevedale Group, Eastern Italian Alps. In addition, they investigated the feasibility of using the image-based approach for the detection of the surface displacement rate of an active rock glacier.…”
Section: Research and Innovative Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wickert, 2016 Multitemporal data set to evaluate erosion patterns: Loye et al, 2016;Bechet et al, 2015; SfM for glacial processes: Westoby et al, 2016;Piermattei et al, 2016 graphic data type, which vary depending on the objectives of the analysis; often significant weaknesses or methodological limitations exist, which prevent us from gaining the insights into processes that we otherwise might. The interdisciplinarity of geomorphometry is its greatest strength and also one of its major challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, their repetitivity can be annual or even at smaller time intervals, mostly depending on the terrain characteristics and the range of surface velocities. So far, these methods have rarely been used for rock glacier studies [17][18][19][20], and no investigations have yet addressed the potential of those methods for long-term monitoring of the surface kinematics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images acquired were processed using the commercial software Agisoft PhotoScan®, as already successfully considered in different analyses (Doneus et al, 2011;Javernick et al, 2014;Piermattei et al, 2016;Prosdocimi et al, 2015;Verhoeven et al, 2012;Woodget et al, 2015). A custom algorithm similar to the Lowe's (2004) Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) object recognition system was used by the software to determine the 3D location of matching features in multiple images.…”
Section: Surface Elevation Changes Through Structure-from-motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote-sensing technologies have proven to facilitate significantly the creation of high-resolution DEMs (Aucelli et al, 2016;Tarolli, 2014;Tarolli et al, 2015), and the availability of DEMs at multiple scales in terms of resolution but also temporal coverage is becoming essential to the understanding of global issues, such sediment production and anthropogenic changes to the Earth system, among others . The recent development of the photogrammetric technique 'Structure-from-Motion' (SfM) has confirmed to represent a valid and cheaper alternative to the established airborne and terrestrial lidar (Light Detection and Ranging) technology for measuring soil surface changes in different environments (Dandois and Ellis, 2013;Eltner et al, 2015;James and Robson, 2012;Masiero et al, 2015;Piermattei et al, 2016;Westoby et al, 2012;Whitehead et al, 2013;Woodget et al, 2015). All this information can shed light into the connectivity within the soil and water losses (López-Vicente et al, 2016;Marchamalo et al, 2016;Masselink et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%