2015
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-015-0757-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suitability of fly ash brick masonry as infill in reinforced concrete frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be highlighted that most past studies [13,[43][44][45][46] used fly ash or solid clay bricks, hollow blocks, or concrete bricks/blocks as infills. In the current study, frames were infilled with fly ash bricks, which were found to be considerably softer and weaker compared to the RC frame [47]. Similar to past studies [48,49], this low-strength masonry was used in order to reduce the effect of infill on the lateral load response of the frames and the shear demand on the columns due to the frame-infill interaction.…”
Section: Nonlinear Modelling and Calibration Of Infill Panelmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be highlighted that most past studies [13,[43][44][45][46] used fly ash or solid clay bricks, hollow blocks, or concrete bricks/blocks as infills. In the current study, frames were infilled with fly ash bricks, which were found to be considerably softer and weaker compared to the RC frame [47]. Similar to past studies [48,49], this low-strength masonry was used in order to reduce the effect of infill on the lateral load response of the frames and the shear demand on the columns due to the frame-infill interaction.…”
Section: Nonlinear Modelling and Calibration Of Infill Panelmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this paper, the variation of c ci due to the location of the column in the building was neglected, and the value 0.5 was considered. In the case studies examined, the ratio between the stiffness of columns and that of the infills is very high, since fly ash bricks were considered as infill, which are considerably softer and weaker compared to the RC frame [47]. Figure 14 shows, for example, the shear demand in the first storey corner column of frame Y1 (case study C) during the pushover analysis under the uniform distribution of lateral loads.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solid clay bricks are typically adopted in northern Europe and in United States, where RC framed building are not as common as in Mediterranean regions. On the other hand, solid concrete bricks are widely used in South Asia (Basha and Kaushik 2016;Ganz 2003;De Luca et al 2019;Salmanpour et al 2012). Figure 7 reports the number of specimens with hollow and solid units, in case of concrete and clay bricks.…”
Section: Solid)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists have used different methods [ 19 ] to increase the porosity in modern brick production. A wide variety of waste materials have also been tested as sources of additives, including paper production residue [ 20 ]; cigarette butts [ 21 ]; rice husk ash [ 22 , 23 ]; kraft pulp production residue [ 24 ]; waste tea [ 25 ]; sawdust [ 26 ]; vine shoots [ 27 ]; vegetable matter [ 28 ]; pineapple leaf fibers [ 29 ]; organic matter [ 7 ]; sugarcane bagasse ash waste [ 30 ]; incorporated biomasses [ 31 ]; corn cobs [ 32 ]; organic and inorganic wastes [ 33 ]; ice husks, sawdust, coir pith and fly ash [ 16 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]; granite sawing wastes [ 39 ]; municipal solid waste incinerator slag [ 40 ]; kaolin fine quarry residue, granulated blast-furnace slag and granite–basalt fine quarry residue [ 41 ]; Waelz slag and waste foundry sand [ 42 ]; industrial nanocrystalline aluminum sludge [ 43 ]; waste glass [ 44 ]; construction and demolition waste [ 45 ]; and crumb rubber, cement kiln dust, mine tailings, slags, wood sawdust, cotton waste, limestone powder and petroleum effluent treatment plant sludge [ 19 , 46 , 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%