2015
DOI: 10.3390/w7010348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suitability of a Coupled Hydrodynamic Water Quality Model to Predict Changes in Water Quality from Altered Meteorological Boundary Conditions

Abstract: Downscaled climate scenarios can be used to inform management decisions on investment in infrastructure or alternative water sources within water supply systems. Appropriate models of the system components, such as catchments, rivers, lakes and reservoirs, are required. The climatic sensitivity of the coupled hydrodynamic water quality model ELCOM-CAEDYM was investigated, by incrementally altering boundary conditions, to determine its suitability for evaluating climate change impacts. A series of simulations w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models of different complexity have previously been applied for studying impacts of reservoir management on water quality. These range from one-dimensional models such as GLM-AED [15], DYRESM-CAEDYM [16] or MyLake [17], to three-dimensional models such as the Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code [18], Delft3D [19] or ELCOM-CAEDYM [16,20]. Models of lower complexity have the advantage of shorter computation times, allowing for large numbers of simulations, e.g., for the purpose of parameter estimation or scenario simulations, but may not be able to adequately reproduce the effects of local inflows on basin-scale dynamics and water quality, especially for large local discharges as they are typically introduced by PS operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of different complexity have previously been applied for studying impacts of reservoir management on water quality. These range from one-dimensional models such as GLM-AED [15], DYRESM-CAEDYM [16] or MyLake [17], to three-dimensional models such as the Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code [18], Delft3D [19] or ELCOM-CAEDYM [16,20]. Models of lower complexity have the advantage of shorter computation times, allowing for large numbers of simulations, e.g., for the purpose of parameter estimation or scenario simulations, but may not be able to adequately reproduce the effects of local inflows on basin-scale dynamics and water quality, especially for large local discharges as they are typically introduced by PS operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecological modeling is the result of the demand to comprehend biotic responses to environmental impacts, as abiotic criteria are not sufficient to represent the full complexity of aquatic systems. In recent decades, technological advances, as well as conceptual improvements and increased access for different social actors in the modeling process (Robson, 2014) have allowed the expansion of these tools (Ulańczyk et al, 2018;van der Linden et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%