2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10914-020-09521-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suidae Transition at the Miocene-Pliocene Boundary: a Reassessment of the Taxonomy and Chronology of Propotamochoerus provincialis

Abstract: The Miocene-Pliocene (Turolian-Ruscinian) transition represents a fundamental interval in the evolution of Euro-Mediterranean paleocommunities. In fact, the paleoenvironmental changes connected with the end of the Messinian salinity crisis are reflected by a major renewal in mammal faunal assemblages. An important bioevent among terrestrial large mammals is the dispersal of the genus Sus, which replaced all other suid species during the Pliocene. Despite its possible paleoecological and biochronological releva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, some suids remains have been referred to as Listriodon von Meyer, 1846 [157], and cf. "Microstonyx" major (Kaup, 1833) [158][159][160], the latter species being more commonly placed in Hippopotamodon Lydekker, 1877 [161], in the recent literature [162]. For completeness, it is worth mentioning that another notable alleged earliest European occurrence based on the material from Vialette, that of Canis Linnaeus, 1758 [51], which played a significant role in the decline of the use of Azzaroli's "Wolf event" [28,29], has also been recently questioned by Böhme et al [90], who regarded it as Eucyon Tedford & Qiu, 1996 [163].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, some suids remains have been referred to as Listriodon von Meyer, 1846 [157], and cf. "Microstonyx" major (Kaup, 1833) [158][159][160], the latter species being more commonly placed in Hippopotamodon Lydekker, 1877 [161], in the recent literature [162]. For completeness, it is worth mentioning that another notable alleged earliest European occurrence based on the material from Vialette, that of Canis Linnaeus, 1758 [51], which played a significant role in the decline of the use of Azzaroli's "Wolf event" [28,29], has also been recently questioned by Böhme et al [90], who regarded it as Eucyon Tedford & Qiu, 1996 [163].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, noted that P. hysudricus differs from P. palaeochoerus in the generally simpler (even if large) third lobe of the m3 and the size of particular tooth loci. Other species of Propotamochoerus recognized in Europe are P. provincialis and P. aegaeus from eastern Europe and Turkey (Geraads et al 2008;Pickford 2013;Lazaridis 2015;Iannucci et al 2021;Kostopoulos and Sylvestrou 2022;Lazaridis et al 2022), both recorded during the Turolian and whose distinction has been disputed (Iannucci et al 2021), whereas P. hyotherioides is recorded in the latest Miocene of China (Van der Made and Han 1994;Hou et al 2019).…”
Section: Taxonomic Attributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…provincialis, and Pr. wui (Hünermann, 1968;Schmidt-Kittler, 1971;Pickford, 1988Pickford, , 2013Van der Made and Moyà-Solà, 1989;Van der Made and Han, 1994;Fortelius et al, 1996a;Van der Made et al, 1999;Geraads et al, 2008;Sein et al, 2009;Hou et al, 2019;Iannucci et al, 2021). Isolated teeth of these species are of similar morphology and partly overlap in size, and hence they are often difficult to identify.…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Van der Made, 1999;Geraads et al, 2008) and then to Pr. provincialis (Iannucci et al, 2021). Once excluded the putative late records, the chronological distribution of Pr.…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation