2015
DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suicide in Canada: impact of injuries with undetermined intent on regional rankings

Abstract: The impact of underreporting or misclassifying suicides as injuries with undetermined intent is rarely evaluated. We assessed whether undetermined injury deaths influenced provincial rankings of suicide in Canada, using 2 735 152 Canadians followed for mortality from 1991 to 2001. We found that suicide rates increased by up to 26.5% for men and 37.7% for women after including injuries with undetermined intent, shifting provincial rankings of suicide. Attention to the stigma of suicide and to coding suicides as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of suicide underreporting for different sexes, age groups, sexuality tendencies and types of suicide are diverse [ 7 – 10 ], which authors superficially mentioned. In addition to subpopulations, there are systematic reasons for underreporting including low accuracy in determining the underlying causes of deaths [ 11 ], inaccurate collection and coding (misclassifying of suicides as injuries) that are problematic for data stakeholders [ 12 ], stigma [ 13 ] and high standards of proof [ 12 ]. Majority of these reasons, for example, are different for urban population with high exposure to ambient air pollution and rural residents in which air pollution is low.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of suicide underreporting for different sexes, age groups, sexuality tendencies and types of suicide are diverse [ 7 – 10 ], which authors superficially mentioned. In addition to subpopulations, there are systematic reasons for underreporting including low accuracy in determining the underlying causes of deaths [ 11 ], inaccurate collection and coding (misclassifying of suicides as injuries) that are problematic for data stakeholders [ 12 ], stigma [ 13 ] and high standards of proof [ 12 ]. Majority of these reasons, for example, are different for urban population with high exposure to ambient air pollution and rural residents in which air pollution is low.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data include Vital Statistics records for the province of Manitoba, where the recorded cause of death is coded using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, with Canadian Enhancements (ICD‐10‐CA). The following codes were considered as markers of death from suicide and were intentionally broad to capture the recognized underclassification of suicide deaths (Auger, Burrows, Gamache, & Hamel, ; Donaldson, Larsen, Fullerton‐Gleason, & Olson, ; Moyer, Boyle, & Pollock, ) and are consistent with previous literature for classification of definite and probable suicides (John et al., ): Intentional self‐harm: ICD‐10 codes X60–X84. Late effects of intentional self‐harm: ICD‐10‐CA code Y87.0. Poisoning of undetermined intent: ICD‐10 codes Y10–Y19. Other events of undetermined intent: ICD‐10 codes Y20–Y34. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Fourth, the classification of a suicide death is limited to the coroner classification of death. It is known that suicide deaths are often misclassified, such as accident and undetermined intent injuries (O'Carroll, ; Rockett, Kapusta, & Bhandari, ), which occurs in up to 30% of the cases (Auger et al., ). This underreporting bias was addressed by including codes to improve sensitivity but does introduce the potential for false positive suicide deaths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even suicide mortality is at high risk of misclassification due to the difficulty of inferring intent when determining cause of death. [26][27][28] Despite the potential for measurement challenges, variations in study designs (eg, cohorts, registry data), and heterogeneity among survivor samples, Cancer December 15, 2020 continuing to examine risk factors associated with suicidal ideation is important given the potential severity of any reported ideation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%