Suicidal Ideation and Self-Harm in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth

Liu, Richard T.; Mustanski, Brian

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.023

Cited by 323 publications

(221 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

197

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, it may be that impulsivity only relates to a sub-group of suicide attempters. Contrary to previous findings (e.g., Brezo, Paris, & Vitaro et al, 2006;Klonsky & May, 2010;Liu & Mustanski, 2012;Lynam, Miller, & Miller et al, 2011), however, impulsivity did not distinguish between ideators and controls. This disparity may be due to the different conceptualisations of impulsivity in the literature (Anestis, Soberay, & Gutierrez et al, 2014) or the adoption of only two items to index impulsivity in the present research or because the mean age of our sample is older than many of the previously published studies.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Differentiating suicide attempters from suicide ideators using the Integrated Motivational–Volitional model of suicidal behaviour

Dhingra

Boduszek

O’Connor

2015

Journal of Affective Disorders

139

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Differentiating suicide attempters from suicide ideators using the Integrated Motivational–Volitional model of suicidal behaviour

Dhingra

Boduszek

O’Connor

2015

Journal of Affective Disorders

139

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite of the fact that these variables appear to be unconnected, this SR made the relationship between each of them and the SB clear, including the relationship between several of them. For the aforesaid, it would be advisable to expand the search with variables which, even if not closely associated with SB for future research, at least should provide important information as, for instance, sexual orientation, since different studies show that groups of Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, and Transsexuals have a higher risk of SB (Eisenberg & Resnick, 2006;Haas et al, 2010;Harris, 2013;Liu & Mustanski, 2012;Power et al, 2016). In view of all this, intervention and/or prevention plans (with instruments that detect, for example, psychological abuse; see Saldaña, Rodríguez-Carballeira, Almendros, & Escartín, 2017) can be set up and targeted at groups that are more frequently associated with SBs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sociodemographic Variables Most Associated with Suicidal Behaviour and Suicide Methods in Europe and America. A Systematic Review

Cano-Montalbán

Quevedo-Blasco

2018

The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A B S T R A C TThis Systematic Review is thought to deepen the relation between sociodemographic variables most associated with suicidal behaviour and suicide methods in Europe and America. A research was made from articles and reviews published between [2005][2006][2007][2008][2009][2010][2011][2012][2013][2014][2015] in PsycINFO, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and SciELO. Thanks to it, we retrieved 5,222 records which were analysed against the inclusion (e.g., any design of the study, published in English or Spanish) and quality criteria, including 53 studies in the review. In these results it is noticeable how men (36% of the studies) and elderly (28% of the studies) commit suicide more frequently. Women (30% of the studies) and young people (17% of the studies) have more attempts and suicidal behaviour. The most commonly used methods among them include hanging (24% of the studies), firearm (17% of the studies), and precipitation (6% of the studies); unemployment (17% of the studies), rural life (9% of the studies), a marital status other than marriage (15% of the studies), and low education (23% of the studies) are also closely associated with both suicide and suicidal behaviour. Consequently, important connections can be concluded when carrying out psychological autopsies, which should be taken into account due to their clear implications in personal and material damage that must be elucidated judicially, clarifying the specific occurrence as suicide, homicide, or accident.Las variables sociodemográficas más asociadas con el comportamiento suicida y con los métodos suicidas en Europa y América. Una revisión sistemática R E S U M E N Esta revisión sistemática tiene por objetivo profundizar en la relación entre las variables sociodemográficas más asociadas con el comportamiento suicida y los métodos suicidas en Europa y América. Se realizó una investigación a partir de artículos y revisiones publicadas entre 2005-2015 en PsycINFO, Medline, Colección Principal de Web of Science, Scopus y SciELO. Se recuperaron 5.222 registros, en los que se analizaron los criterios de inclusión (p. ej., cualquier diseño de estudio, publicado en inglés o español) y de calidad, incluyendo 53 estudios en la revisión. En estos resultados se observa que los hombres (36% de los estudios) y los ancianos (28% de los estudios) presentan unas tasas superiores de suicidio que las mujeres (30% de los estudios) y los jóvenes (17% de los estudios) tienen más intentos y conductas suicidas. Los métodos más utilizados son el ahorcamiento (24% de los estudios), las armas de fuego (17% de los estudios) y la precipitación (6% de los estudios); el desempleo (17% de los estudios), la vida rural (9% de los estudios), un estado civil distinto de matrimonio (15% de los estudios) y un nivel educativo bajo (23% de los estudios) también están estrechamente relacionados con el suicidio y el comportamiento suicida. Se puede concluir la importancia de realizar autopsias psicológicas, las cuales deberán tener en cuenta los factores analizad...

show abstract

“…1,8,[10][11][12][13][14] In terms of sources of resiliency, social support (i.e., perceived support from members in one's social networks) has been linked to lower levels of suicidal ideation, psychological distress, hopelessness, and depressive symptoms. 3,[12][13][14] In studies including both heterosexual and LGBT youth, these effects were especially strong among LGBT youth. 3 Thus, although victimization places LGBT youth at risk for negative mental health outcomes, research supports the potential of social support to reduce these outcomes for LGBT youth.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Typologies of Social Support and Associations with Mental Health Outcomes Among LGBT Youth

2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth show increased risk for a number of negative mental health outcomes, which research has linked to minority stressors such as victimization. Further, social support promotes positive mental health outcomes for LGBT youth, and different sources of social support show differential relationships with mental health outcomes. However, little is known about how combinations of different sources of support impact mental health. Methods: In the present study, we identify clusters of family, peer, and significant other social support and then examine demographic and mental health differences by cluster in an analytic sample of 232 LGBT youth between the ages of 16 and 20 years. Results: Using k-means cluster analysis, three social support cluster types were identified: high support (44.0% of participants), low support (21.6%), and non-family support (34.5%). A series of chi-square tests were used to examine demographic differences between these clusters, which were found for socio-economic status (SES). Regression analyses indicated that, while controlling for victimization, individuals within the three clusters showed different relationships with multiple mental health outcomes: loneliness, hopelessness, depression, anxiety, somatization, general symptom severity, and symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD). Conclusion: Findings suggest the combinations of sources of support LGBT youth receive are related to their mental health. Higher SES youth are more likely to receive support from family, peers, and significant others. For most mental health outcomes, family support appears to be an especially relevant and important source of support to target for LGBT youth.

show abstract

Suicidal Ideation and Self-Harm in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth

Cited by 323 publications

References 63 publications

Differentiating suicide attempters from suicide ideators using the Integrated Motivational–Volitional model of suicidal behaviour

Differentiating suicide attempters from suicide ideators using the Integrated Motivational–Volitional model of suicidal behaviour

Sociodemographic Variables Most Associated with Suicidal Behaviour and Suicide Methods in Europe and America. A Systematic Review

Typologies of Social Support and Associations with Mental Health Outcomes Among LGBT Youth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About