Sugestão de roteiro para avaliação de um artigo científico

The technical report of the CAPES’ technical production working group: a critical view

“…Relevant to our discussion, in summary, the authors propose, as part of the results, the need for a report to possess the characteristics presented in Table 2. The postulations of Soubhia, Ruffino, and Dessunti (2005) find resonance in Pereira (2012), Lima (2013), andPorto andGurgel (2018) when discussing elements related to the writing of an article. They are also echoed in Martens, Pedron, and Oliveira (2021), who present characteristics necessary for a technical report, closely aligned with expectations for a scientific article.…”

“…In this regard, Savickas (2009) In line with this, Lima (2013) presents a reference on what not to do when writing an article and defines a technical report as a manuscript that "Reports on an investigation already carried out and specifies the steps taken, the results obtained, the analysis/interpretation of data, and the established conclusions" (Lima, 2013, p. 58; translation ours), corroborating many elements presented by Soubhia, Ruffino, and Dessunti (2005), Savickas (2009), Motta (2017), and Martens, Pedron, and Oliveira (2021), indicating the similarities between a report and an article regarding various aspects. Thus, a technical report, not unlike a scientific article (Pereira, 2012;Lima, 2013;Porto;Gurgel, 2018), should be capable of convincing the reader of its truth by describing and arguing with clarity and objectivity, either through logical concatenation of its ideas or by supporting these ideas with practical experience or appropriate literature that can provide substantiation for the assertions.…”

“…However, this formal pattern is not followed in sections 6 and 7, without apparent reason. According to Pereira (2012), Lima (2013), and Porto and Gurgel (2018), this indicates a potential flaw in the manuscript, compromising its objectives.…”

“…In addition to the conceptual weakness of the criteria provided by the WGTP (Brasil, 2019), there is a contradiction in the statement that "A production with no apparent innovation" constitutes a "Technical production" when, in a previous section, it was stated that "A product derived from the adaptation of existing knowledge will be considered a technical product and not technological" (Brasil, 2019, p. 2; translation ours), as another example of argumentative and theoretical weakness. Such characteristics in a report compromise its clarity and usefulness, limiting its ability to convince the reader, as required by this type of work, as warned by Pereira (2012), Porto andGurgel (2018), and Souza (2022).…”

O relatório técnico do grupo de trabalho de produção técnica da CAPES: uma visão crítica

“…Nessa linha, Lima (2013) apresenta uma referência sobre o que não fazer ao se escrever um artigo e define relatório técnico como um manuscrito que "Relata a investigação já realizada e especifica os passos dados, os resultados obtidos, a análise/interpretação dos dados e as conclusões estabelecidas" (Lima, 2013, p, 58), Assim, um relatório técnico, não muito diferentemente de um artigo científico (Pereira, 2012;Lima, 2013;Porto;Gurgel, 2018), deve ser capaz de convencer o leitor sobre sua verdade, descrevendo e argumentando com clareza e objetividade, seja pela concatenação lógica de suas ideias, seja apoiando essas ideias em uma vivência prática ou na literatura adequada, capazes de dar sustentação ao que é afirmado.…”