2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sugars relevant for sourdough fermentation stimulate growth of and bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus amylovorus DCE 471

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the juice with 50 g/L sucrose, similar results were reported by Leroy et al. (2006), who observed that when growing on a single energy source, the L. amylovorus was unable to grow on sucrose. These authors concluded that the combination of sugars is relevant to fermenting doughs positively, which affects the competitiveness and functionality of the microorganism.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…For the juice with 50 g/L sucrose, similar results were reported by Leroy et al. (2006), who observed that when growing on a single energy source, the L. amylovorus was unable to grow on sucrose. These authors concluded that the combination of sugars is relevant to fermenting doughs positively, which affects the competitiveness and functionality of the microorganism.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The persistence of L . amylovorus in sourdoughs may be also attributed to its high amylolytic activity and ability to produce bacteriocine amylovorin, a common feature for representatives of this species [ 28 29 ]. The same fingerprint type of dominant L .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other carbohydrates (except sucrose) were determined similarly. Sucrose was determined by high performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection, as described previously (Leroy, De Winter, Adriany, Neysens, & De Vuyst, 2006). Ethanol, acetoin, and diacetyl were determined by dynamic headspace gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, as described previously (Sarantinopoulos et al, 2001b).…”
Section: Sampling and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%