2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warnings and Purchases: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
85
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
9
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent experimental studies in Latin American populations have found that the style of FOP warning labels used in Chile is easier to understand and more likely to discourage consumption than other types of FOP labels, such as the GDAs or traffic-light labels [66][67][68]. In addition, a recent US-based randomized experiment found that nutrient-based FOP warning labels reduced SSB purchases by 31 calories per interaction, or 22% [69], which is similar to the effect observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Recent experimental studies in Latin American populations have found that the style of FOP warning labels used in Chile is easier to understand and more likely to discourage consumption than other types of FOP labels, such as the GDAs or traffic-light labels [66][67][68]. In addition, a recent US-based randomized experiment found that nutrient-based FOP warning labels reduced SSB purchases by 31 calories per interaction, or 22% [69], which is similar to the effect observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As in previous labeling studies [ 25 ], a barcode was selected as the control label because it controls for the effect of putting a label on the front of a package (e.g., size, placement, obscuring branding), while also allowing all participants to respond to questions about a label.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrition warnings that stated that a product was high or low in a key nutrient, such as sugar, sodium, or total fat influenced adults to avoid products with excessive amounts of these nutrients [73]. Warning labels that expressed general health consequences of excess sugar intake led adults to choose a beverage with less sugar compared to control labels [69]. Lima et al [39] investigated the impact of traffic light labels and nutrition warnings on drink choices of both children and adults.…”
Section: Labelmentioning
confidence: 99%