2001
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v98.13.3626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sugar profiling proves that human serum erythropoietin differs from recombinant human erythropoietin

Abstract: Erythropoietin (EPO) from sera obtained from anemic patients was successfully isolated using magnetic beads coated with a human EPO (hEPO)-specific antibody. Human serum EPO emerged as a broad band after sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, with an apparent molecular weight slightly smaller than that of recombinant hEPO (rhEPO). The bandwidth corresponded with microheterogeneity because of extensive glycosylation. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis revealing several different glycoforms c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
160
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(110 reference statements)
7
160
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the association with the formulation of epoetin alfa marketed outside the United States, there is no reason to believe that the amino acid sequence of the molecule is different in this particular brand. Subtle differences exist between the carbohydrate moieties of epoetin alfa and beta (31,32), but it seems unlikely that they have significant impact on immunogenicity. Moreover, there is no indication that the glycosylation pattern of epoetin alfa has changed over time and could therefore explain the uspsurge of PRCA cases.…”
Section: Possible Causes and Risk Factors Of Immunogenicity Of Epoetinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the association with the formulation of epoetin alfa marketed outside the United States, there is no reason to believe that the amino acid sequence of the molecule is different in this particular brand. Subtle differences exist between the carbohydrate moieties of epoetin alfa and beta (31,32), but it seems unlikely that they have significant impact on immunogenicity. Moreover, there is no indication that the glycosylation pattern of epoetin alfa has changed over time and could therefore explain the uspsurge of PRCA cases.…”
Section: Possible Causes and Risk Factors Of Immunogenicity Of Epoetinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only limited data have been reported relating to the detailed N-glycan structures of the isoforms of EPO with their biological activities (Takeuchi et al, 1989). More detailed structural information about differences in glycosylation between EPOs can be obtained by N-glycan profiling techniques (Rice et al, 1992;Nimtz et al, 1993;Kanazawa et al, 1999;Skibeli et al, 2001), based on the release of N-glycans and their subsequent mapping. We have recently also described such a method for profiling the N-glycans of glycoproteins (Yuen et al, 2002), which can be applied to small (2-5 lg) amounts of EPO.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the other epoetins, epoetin omega (Repotin 1 , Bioclones, Cape Town, South Africa) is produced in EPO cDNA-transfected baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells. Epoetin omega has an N-glycan with phosphorylated oligomannoside chains, and it possesses less O-glycans than the CHO-cell derived rhEPOs [81,84]. The clinical consequences of these glycosylation differences have not been studied, probably because epoetin omega is not widely used.…”
Section: Types Of Epoetinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amino acid sequence of all epoetins is identical with that of endogenous EPO, but the glycans of the products exhibit structural differences [11]. Epoetin alfa is more homogenous and possesses less basic isoforms than epoetin beta [80,81]. Reportedly, structural differences even exist between the established epoetin alfa formulations, Epogen 1 (Amgen) and Eprex 1 (J&J) [82].…”
Section: Types Of Epoetinsmentioning
confidence: 99%