2020
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toaa194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sugar content of diet does not buffer against chronic oral imidacloprid exposure in the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)

Abstract: Bees are economically critical pollinators, but are declining broadly due to several stressors, including nontarget exposure to insecticides and deficiencies in nutrition. Understanding the simultaneous impact of stressors, particularly interactions between them, is critical to effectively conserving bees. Although behavioral effects of pesticides like neonicotinoids have received some attention in solitary bees, our understanding of how they are modulated by diet quality is limited. Furthermore, scarce data e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poor nutrition can make bees more vulnerable to pesticide exposure, but most previous research has focused on the interactions between pesticides and pollen intake, or floral diversity [ 24 27 , 84 86 ]. We found that flupyradifurone impaired sucrose responsiveness and long-term memory when bumblebees were nutritionally stressed and healthy, indicating that higher carbohydrate intake did not buffer the negative consequences of pesticide exposure [ 30 ]. This is not surprising as negative effects of pesticides on bees regularly occur even when bees are fed high sucrose concentrations [ 41 , 45 , 87 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Poor nutrition can make bees more vulnerable to pesticide exposure, but most previous research has focused on the interactions between pesticides and pollen intake, or floral diversity [ 24 27 , 84 86 ]. We found that flupyradifurone impaired sucrose responsiveness and long-term memory when bumblebees were nutritionally stressed and healthy, indicating that higher carbohydrate intake did not buffer the negative consequences of pesticide exposure [ 30 ]. This is not surprising as negative effects of pesticides on bees regularly occur even when bees are fed high sucrose concentrations [ 41 , 45 , 87 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interactions between these stressors can be: (i) additive, where the two stressors are equal to their combined individual effect; (ii) synergistic, where the two stressors exacerbate one another and have a greater than additive effect; or (iii) antagonistic, where the impact is lower than the predicted additive effect [23]. Previous studies have found that most interactions between pesticides and poor nutrition are additive [23][24][25][26] or synergistic [13,14,[27][28][29][30]. The underlying mechanism that determines the type of interaction (synergistic, additive or antagonistic) between pesticides and poor nutrition is poorly understood and requires further investigation [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, granular formulations are understudied relative to seed and foliar applications [43]. Furthermore, field studies on neonicotinoids and ALCBs are surprisingly uncommon relative to laboratory exposure trials [44][45][46][47]. Field enclosure experiments with closely related solitary bees (Osmia) and neonicotinoid-treated crops, albeit using different application methods, found varying effects on bee reproduction [48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by our occasional observations of dead bees on flowers only in imidacloprid cages. While oral LD 50 and LC 50 values of imidacloprid for ALCBs are not well established ( [63], but see [64]), Cecala et al [47] documented 29% and 68% reductions in adult ALCB longevity from ingesting 30 and 200 ppb sucrose syrups, respectively. In their experiment, survivorship fell to 50% after 6-12 days, depending on dosage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%