Suffering and sense of self: The tension between reflection and experience—The case of depression

Abstract

The tension between reflection and experience has been highlighted by Buddhism as the origin of human suffering, described as an undercurrent and constant feelings of restlessness, grasping, anxiety, and dissatisfaction or disease. This universal suffering experience called Dukkha refers to the failure to find a Self in reflection or the frustrated desire or craving to have or to be something. For Buddhism, not only the desired object is illusory, but so is the desiring self. Further, Varela et al. (1993) integrate these ideas into the development of cognitive sciences and the understanding of human experience from an embodied and selfless mind perspective. The present article attempts to apply the Buddhist notion of suffering or Dukkha along with Varela, Thompson, and Rosch’s contributions to the understanding of the embodied sense of Self that characterizes symptoms of Depression. The expression of the self-grasping suffering experiences and the tension between reflection and experience for depressive patients will be discussed from an enacted and embodied perspective. Further, new research ideas along with possible new psychotherapeutic approaches are discussed.

The roots and blossoms of 4E cognition in Chile: Introduction to the Special Issue on 4E cognition in Chile

“…In the case of practical applications of embodied cognition, the article by María Isabel Gaete (2023), entitled “Suffering and sense of self: The tension between reflection and experience-The case of depression,” seeks to apply the Buddhist notion of suffering or Dukkha together with the contributions of Varela et al (1991) to the understanding of the embodied sense of self that characterizes the symptoms of depression. The article explores the tension between the reflection and the experience of suffering in light of the embodied cognition that allows tuning in with the Buddhist foundations of the “sense of self” (as opposed to the dualistic notions derived from the Cartesian “the self”).…”