2011
DOI: 10.1159/000329995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sudden Gains in the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Abstract: Background: The present study examined sudden gains during treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and their relationship to short- and long-term outcome. Methods: Ninety-one individuals (age 19–64) completed either cognitive treatment, exposure treatment, or their combination with fluvoxamine for OCD. Participants’ obsessive-compulsive symptoms were assessed before each weekly treatment session. In addition, obsessive-compulsive and depressive symptoms were assessed pre treatment and post treatment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies reported that 34–52% of individuals experienced SGs. The between group effect size at post-treatment (SG vs. no SG) of d = 1.04 in the present study is in the same range as in the mean d of 0.75 across CBT studies found in the meta-analysis (Aderka et al, 2012a). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies reported that 34–52% of individuals experienced SGs. The between group effect size at post-treatment (SG vs. no SG) of d = 1.04 in the present study is in the same range as in the mean d of 0.75 across CBT studies found in the meta-analysis (Aderka et al, 2012a). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Aside from CBT for depression, SGs have also been shown to be a common feature in CBT for social anxiety disorder (Hofmann, Schulz, Meuret, Moscovitch, & Suvak, 2006), panic disorder (Clerkin, Teachman, & Smith-Janik, 2008), generalized anxiety disorder (Present et al, 2008), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (Aderka et al, 2012a). A recent meta-analytic review investigating the effect of SGs for depression and anxiety disorders showed that the between-group effect size of individuals with vs. without SG was moderate to large (Hedges’ g = 0.62) on primary outcomes (Aderka et al, 2012b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Sudden gains predict superior end-oftreatment outcomes and long-term maintenance of gains. 7,8 While cognitive changes during the critical session appear to account for the sudden gains, the nature of these changes has not been fully explained, and no detailed reports of how therapists and patients experience these changes have been presented. Therefore, this case study discusses the nature of the cognitive changes that both the patient and therapist understood to occur during the critical session and that they believed contributed to the remission of major depressive disorder over a 2-year period.…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following research confirmed these results and showed that sudden gains are a frequent phenomenon among patients with different disorders like depression (Hardy et al, ; Lutz et al, ; Tang, DeRubeis, Beberman, & Pham, ), social anxiety disorder (Bohn, Aderka, Schreiber, Stangier, & Hofmann, ; Hofmann, Schulz, Meuret, Moscovitch, & Suvak, ), generalized anxiety disorder (Deschênes & Dugas, ), posttraumatic stress disorder (Aderka, Appelbaum‐Namdar, Shafran, & Gilboa‐Schechtman, ; Doane, Feeny, & Zoellner, ; Krüger et al, ), or obsessive‐compulsive disorder (Aderka, Nickerson, Bøe, & Hofmann, ). A meta‐analysis also showed that the occurrence of sudden gains within a therapy predicts significantly better outcomes at the end of therapy (Aderka et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%