Methods:The first 400 patients submitted to the Swedish national database for SSNHL were analyzed. Information was collected at the first visit about the patient's past medical history, potential precipitating events traumata, family medical history, hearing loss, current disease, diagnostic protocol and treatment using questionnaires as well as two audiograms for each patient, one at the first visit to the ENT-clinic and one three months later.Results: 65% of these 400 patients underwent hematological tests and 40% had an MRI/CT.22/160 MRI investigated had pathological findings: five acoustic neuromas, one subdural hematoma, one pons infarction, five vascular abnormalities and ten patients had accidental findings not connected to the hearing tracts. 300 of these 400 patients were evaluated as idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL); 24% of them had one or more pathological tests. No significant correlation was found between either the MRI findings or the laboratory findings with regard to either treatment or hearing recovery in patients with ISSNHL.
Conclusion:Results from a database for SSNHL demonstrate no correlation between laboratory findings, treatment and outcome in 400 patients. The patients with pathological tests were not treated differently from those with normal tests or no tests taken. The value of laboratory findings and MRI might increase if the results are categorized to more specific diagnoses.