Suction curettage under laparoscopic vision for advanced angular pregnancy

Kambhampati, L.; Kitova-John, Margarita Borislavova; Allahdin, Sabeena; Voigt, Stephan

doi:10.3109/01443615.2012.689892

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our cases, the smallest myometrial thickness were 3.9 mm and 4.2 mm respectively. Comparing our findings with previous published case-reports, the myometrial thickness cut-off was not precised [ 7 , 9 , 12 – 14 ] or appeared to be heterogeneous with a thickness between 5 and 10 mm [ 8 , 10 , 11 , 15 ]. We support the idea that clear standardized recommendations are needed about the cut-off and the myometrial thickness landmarks measurement.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 65%

Diagnostic dilemma between angular and interstitial ectopic pregnancy: 3D ultrasound features

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Angular pregnancy is a rare entity which is commonly confused with interstitial or cornual pregnancies. A lack of consensus about the specific ultrasound features of these 3 entities leads to inappropriate interchange between them among the literature. An angular pregnancy should be considered as a potentially viable intra-uterine eccentric pregnancy as it might be carried to term and result in a live-born baby whereas interstitial or cornual pregnancies should be considered as ectopic pregnancies which should be interrupted. We report here two cases of women at 8 weeks of pregnancy with an angular pregnancy diagnosed by vaginal 2D and 3D ultrasound and discuss about specific ultrasound features and alternative imaging modalities to distinguish it from interstitial and cornual pregnancies.

show abstract