1989
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910440209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sucrase‐isomaltase expression and enterocytic ultrastructure of human colorectal tumors

Abstract: We report the relative frequency of sucrase-isomaltase (SI) antigen expression in human colonic adenocarcinoma (22/57), in peritumoral mucosa taken next to the tumor (31/41) or distant from it (29/42) as well as in 21/23 polyps. Our results are based on indirect immunofluorescence with a monoclonal antibody (MAb) specific for human intestinal SI. A regular and intense expression of SI occurred only in 6 tumor specimens. In the remaining 16 SI-positive tumor samples, labelling was heterogeneous, i.e., scattered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
14
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(39 reference statements)
3
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These same samples showed virtually undetectable sucrase activity (Rousset M, Zweibaum A, unpublished data). Although there is now general agreement that sucrase-isomaltase is expressed at low levels in normal adult colon (26,27,32,44,45), there is clearly substantially less protein and enzyme activity than in the small intestine and than might have been expected from the levels of mRNA that we have observed in this study. High levels of expression of the sucrase-isomaltase protein in fetal colon between 8 and 30 wk of gestation are well documented (28,(31)(32)(33), and this is consistent with the high mRNA levels observed here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…These same samples showed virtually undetectable sucrase activity (Rousset M, Zweibaum A, unpublished data). Although there is now general agreement that sucrase-isomaltase is expressed at low levels in normal adult colon (26,27,32,44,45), there is clearly substantially less protein and enzyme activity than in the small intestine and than might have been expected from the levels of mRNA that we have observed in this study. High levels of expression of the sucrase-isomaltase protein in fetal colon between 8 and 30 wk of gestation are well documented (28,(31)(32)(33), and this is consistent with the high mRNA levels observed here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Similar transient expression of SI, as well as other intestinal brush border enzymes, has also been observed in the human fetal colon (48). It has been suggested that the mechanisms directing transient SI expression in the colon are recapitulated in the process of human colonic neoplasia, with the reexpression of SI in the majority of colonic adenomatous polyps and adenocarcinomas (4,9,45). A comparable recurrence of SI expression was also found in rodent colon tissues subjected to oncogene-mediated transformations (29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…SI expression is tightly regulated during postnatal development and becomes strongly induced in the small intestine at the transition from suckling to weaning (40). SI reexpression in the colonic epithelium is also observed under certain circumstances such as colonic neoplasia (4,9,45). Our study has undertaken the functional characterization of a novel colonic repressor element of the SI promoter (CRESIP) in the intestinal epithelium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong expressions of sucrase (Zweibaum et al 1983Wiltz et al 1990;Gorvel et al 1991) and sucrase and ALP (Celano et al 1993) have also been observed in some dierentiated human colon cancers and derived cell lines. While one investigation found no dierences in the striated-cell-border activities of sucrase, ALP and maltase between colorectal tumors and peritumoral mucosa (Czernichow et al 1989) and I-ALP activity was contained in normal small-intestinal mucosa, another report found only moderate elevation of I-ALP activity in colon cancers (Harmenberg et al 1991). The cellular heterogeneity of adenocarcinomas with multiple subpopulations of cells with dierent properties might explain this controversy (Arends et al 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%