In this erratum, we make a correction of steady-state ansatz V (t) ≡ v(t, x = −R) used in ref. [1]. The same ansatz was also adopted in our earlier publications [2,3], where the basic framework for the driven translocation was proposed. However, as discussed in [4], one should instead set the steady-state velocity V (t) ≡ v(t, x = 0) for the steady-state approximation to be self-consistent.With this modification only in mind, the following procedure remains almost intact.To be more precise, we here provide a rough sketch of the analysis (see ref.[5] for detailed discussion). From the definition of the current at theone can construct the dynamical scaling of the tension front propagation in the driven translocation process in the following way. Essential ingredients are: i) the dynamical equations of state [6] for the moving domainwhere (p z , p ν ) = (z − 2, (1 − ν)/ν) in the trumpet regime k B T /R 0 < f < k B T /a and (p z , p ν ) = (1, 0) for stronger force, and ii) the average initial configurationFrom eqs. (1)- (4), one can obtain the differential equation for R(t), which leads to the asymptotic scaling for the tension propagation timeAs the tension propagation stage dominates the post-propagation stage in the scaling limit, this is identified with the translocation time scaling τ τ p .The modified ansatz is compatible with the iso-flux model proposed by Rowghanian and Grosberg [7], which is discussed in ref.