2001
DOI: 10.1137/s0895479800373322
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successively Ordered Elementary Bidiagonal Factorization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of a bidiagonal factorization for a given matrix has been linked to certain types of rank conditions associated with the ranks of sets of submatrices, and we make use of this connection here by incorporating them both with Cauchon matrices (or diagrams) and the condensed Cauchon algorithm. The definitions in this section can be found in [10].…”
Section: Descending Rank Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The existence of a bidiagonal factorization for a given matrix has been linked to certain types of rank conditions associated with the ranks of sets of submatrices, and we make use of this connection here by incorporating them both with Cauchon matrices (or diagrams) and the condensed Cauchon algorithm. The definitions in this section can be found in [10].…”
Section: Descending Rank Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If l jk or u jk is 0 in any factor, then that factor is not included in the ESEB factorization. It was shown in [10,Theorem 9] that if an ESEB factorization exists, then it is unique. A very interesting by-product of this characterization (see Theorem 4.8) is the complexity saving associated with determining if a matrix satisfies the row and/or column rank descending conditions.…”
Section: Descending Rank Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An error in the statement of Theorem 15 in [1] was recently discovered. That statement is correct if the matrix A is a unit lower triangular matrix, as was assumed in an earlier version, but is not true in general.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another correction in [1] is as follows: ( n 2 ) in line 6 of the paragraph after Example 1 on page 1080 should be ( n+1 2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%