2018 52nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers 2018
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2018.8645413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successive Self-Interference Cancellation in a Low-Complexity WCP-OFDM Radar Receiver

Abstract: In this paper, we consider a multicarrier waveform to perform simultaneously data transmission and radar sensing. On the radar receiver side, a state-of-the-art symbol-based algorithm generates a range-Doppler map affected by a selfinterference phenomenon, potentially leading to target masking issues. Herein, we propose a successive interference cancellation procedure to enhance the radar performance while keeping a low-complexity implementation. We show that a very low reconstruction error is obtained in vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, the OFDM receiver experiences the inter-pulse interference, usually characterized as white random sidelobes at the output of symbol-based receivers [66]. Such a situation may cause target masking issues and must be mitigated in many realistic scenarios (e.g., high number of targets, clutter), for example, with the help of CLEAN-based techniques [67] or with sparse Bayesian MCMC processing [68].…”
Section: A Communication Signal-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, the OFDM receiver experiences the inter-pulse interference, usually characterized as white random sidelobes at the output of symbol-based receivers [66]. Such a situation may cause target masking issues and must be mitigated in many realistic scenarios (e.g., high number of targets, clutter), for example, with the help of CLEAN-based techniques [67] or with sparse Bayesian MCMC processing [68].…”
Section: A Communication Signal-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[l, n] is specifically related to the presence of random elements (i.e., the data symbols c k,m ) in the transmitted signal (1). It is worth underlining that since we assume the data symbols to be known, they could in theory be used to remove the pedestal of each scatterers (e.g., see [39]). This strategy is out of the scope of this work.…”
Section: Sinr Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This calls for new hardware, to replace the TDD RF switching with more elaborate circulator [20], [23]- [25] or EBD [12], [26], [27] type of circuitries, and has been studied actively over the recent years, under the inband full-duplex radio terminology, with primarily communications applications in mind, see, e.g., [19], [23], [37]- [45]. In the radar context, the self-interference (SI) stemming from the direct coupling of the transmit signal to the receiver can be interpreted as a strong static target at a very short distance [11], [12], [33], [46]. Hence, one could argue that as long as a certain level of TX-RX isolation can be provided, such that the low noise amplifier (LNA) and the rest of the sensitive receiver electronics can tolerate the remaining SI, the true echoes stemming from true targets can be separated in the radar processing.…”
Section: Self-interference Problem and Cancellation Solutions Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is one clear difference to all earlier fullduplex radio works, such as [41], [47], [48], that do not separate between the direct and reflected SI components. Additionally, we note that agnostic digital cancellation techniques, independent of the specific radar processing approach are pursued, which can then be complemented with, e.g., the CLEAN-like methods [11], [12], [32], [33] operating in the radar domain.…”
Section: B Rf and Digital Cancellation Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%