2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successive sedimentary recycling regimes in southwestern Gondwana: Evidence from detrital zircons in Neoproterozoic to Cambrian sedimentary rocks in southern Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies conducted by Andersen et al (2016b), Andersen et al (2018a) and Orejana et al (2015) concluded biased results of conventional zircon studies assuming a direct pathway of sediment source to sediment sink not taking into account repeated sedimentary recycling events obscuring such 'source-to-sink' dynamics. A similar effect has also been suggested by Vorster (2014) and Zieger et al (2019) for the lower Karoo-aged strata (Dwyka Group) of the Main Karoo and Aranos basins.…”
Section: Recycling Dynamics Of the Mesozoic Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent studies conducted by Andersen et al (2016b), Andersen et al (2018a) and Orejana et al (2015) concluded biased results of conventional zircon studies assuming a direct pathway of sediment source to sediment sink not taking into account repeated sedimentary recycling events obscuring such 'source-to-sink' dynamics. A similar effect has also been suggested by Vorster (2014) and Zieger et al (2019) for the lower Karoo-aged strata (Dwyka Group) of the Main Karoo and Aranos basins.…”
Section: Recycling Dynamics Of the Mesozoic Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Comparison of detrital zircon ages of metasedimentary rocks with similar depositional age in the Chinese CTB and Yili Block (this study; Huang et al, ), Tarim Craton (He, Zhu, & Ge, ; He, Zhu, Ge, Zheng, & Wu, ), North China Craton (Luo et al, ; Wan et al, ; Xia, Sun, Zhao & Luo, ; Xia, Sun, Zhao, Wu, et al, ), Siberian Craton (Glorie et al, ; Khudoley et al, ; Powerman et al, ), Amazonian Craton (Babinski et al, 2013; Geraldes et al, ), Yangtze Block (Wang et al, ; Yang et al, ), Cathaysia Block (Yao et al, ; Yu et al, , ), African (Anderson et al, ; Babinski, et al, ; Foster et al, ; Konopásek et al, ; Linol et al, ), Antarctican (Grew et al, ; Marschall et al, ; Takamura et al, ; Wang et al, ), and Indian blocks (Collins et al, ; Dharmapriya et al, ; Li et al, ; Plavsa et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…2.4–2.5 and 3.5 Ga with only inconspicuous peak at 1.4–1.6 Ga (Figure f; Wang et al, ; Yang et al, ). For the same reasons, the African (Figure h; Anderson et al, ; Babinski et al, ; Foster et al, ; Konopásek et al, ; Linol et al, ), Antarctican (Figure l; Grew et al, ; Marschall et al, ; Takamura et al, ; Wang et al, ), Indian (Figure j; Collins et al, ; Dharmapriya et al, ; Li et al, ; Plavsa et al, ), and Australian blocks (Figures b–d; Smits et al, , and references therein) are also excluded for the CTB's origin. For the Cathaysia Block, it has an age peak at 1.21 Ga (Figure g; Yao et al, ; Yu et al, , ), which is not present in the CTB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…6). However, Hfdata reported from the Nama Group (Andersen et al 2018b) covers the same range of εHf values as the modern Orange River sand. Therefore, it is possible that a certain amount of the Cambrian-Ediacaran zircon of the lower Orange derived from the north via the Fish River and its tributaries.…”
Section: Detrital Zircon Age Patterns and Hf-isotopesmentioning
confidence: 83%